Demajo Jean Karl, Cassar Valter, Farrugia Cher, Millan-Sango David, Sammut Charles, Valdramidis Vasilis, Camilleri Josette
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):63-7. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4358.
The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial activity of chemical disinfectants on alginate and silicone impression materials. The effect of chemical disinfectants on the dimensional stability of the impression materials was also assessed.
For the microbiologic assessment, impressions of the maxillary arch were taken from 14 participants, 7 using alginate and 7 using an addition silicone. The impressions were divided into three sections. Each section was subjected to spraying with MD 520 or Minuten or no disinfection (control), respectively. Antimicrobial action of the chemical disinfectants was assessed by measuring microbial counts in trypticase soy agar (TSA) media and expressing the results in colony-forming units/cm2. The surface area of the dental impressions was calculated by scanning a stone cast using computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture and analyzing the data using a custom computer program. The dimensional stability of the impression materials after immersion in disinfectants was assessed by measuring the linear displacement of horizontally restrained materials using a traveling microscope. The percent change in length over 3 hours was thus determined.
Alginate exhibited a higher microbial count than silicone. MD 520 eliminated all microbes as opposed to Minuten. The bacterial growth after Minuten disinfection was almost twice as much for alginate than for addition silicone impressions. The chemical disinfectants affected the alginate dimensional stability. Minuten reduced the shrinkage sustained by alginate during the first hour of storage.
Alginate harbors three times more microorganisms than silicone impression material. Chemical disinfection by glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant was effective in eliminating all microbial forms for both alginate and silicone without modifying the dimensional stability. Alcohol-based disinfectants, however, reduced the alginate shrinkage during the first 90 minutes of setting. The current studies also propose another method to report the surface area based on accurate estimation by 3D image analysis.
本研究旨在评估化学消毒剂对藻酸盐和硅橡胶印模材料的抗菌活性。同时还评估了化学消毒剂对印模材料尺寸稳定性的影响。
为进行微生物学评估,从14名参与者处获取上颌牙弓印模,其中7人使用藻酸盐印模材料,7人使用加成型硅橡胶印模材料。将印模分成三个部分。每个部分分别用MD 520或Minuten进行喷雾消毒或不消毒(对照)。通过测量胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂(TSA)培养基中的微生物数量并以菌落形成单位/cm²表示结果,来评估化学消毒剂的抗菌作用。通过使用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造扫描石膏模型并使用定制计算机程序分析数据,计算牙印模的表面积。通过使用移动显微镜测量水平受限材料的线性位移,评估印模材料浸泡在消毒剂中后的尺寸稳定性。由此确定3小时内长度的百分比变化。
藻酸盐印模的微生物数量高于硅橡胶印模。与Minuten不同,MD 520消除了所有微生物。Minuten消毒后,藻酸盐印模上的细菌生长几乎是加成型硅橡胶印模的两倍。化学消毒剂影响藻酸盐的尺寸稳定性。Minuten减少了藻酸盐在储存第一小时内的收缩。
藻酸盐印模中含有的微生物比硅橡胶印模材料多两倍。基于戊二醛的消毒剂进行化学消毒对藻酸盐和硅橡胶都能有效消除所有微生物形式,且不改变尺寸稳定性。然而,酒精基消毒剂在凝固的前90分钟内减少了藻酸盐的收缩。当前研究还提出了另一种基于三维图像分析准确估计来报告表面积的方法。