• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国不同种族和族裔人群的癌症风险遗传检测和对遗传信息重要性的认知:一项横断面研究。

Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk and Perceived Importance of Genetic Information Among US Population by Race and Ethnicity: a Cross-sectional Study.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, PO Box 100195, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.

UF Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, USA.

出版信息

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Feb;11(1):382-394. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01526-4. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1007/s40615-023-01526-4
PMID:36689121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9870197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genetic testing can help determine the risk of many cancers and guide cancer prevention and treatment plans. Despite increasing concern about disparities in precision cancer medicine, public knowledge and cancer genetic testing by race and ethnicity have not been well investigated.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey in 2022. Self-reported cancer genetic testing (e.g., Lynch syndrome, BRCA1/2) knowledge and utilization were compared by race and ethnicity. Perceived importance of genetic information for cancer care (prevention, detection, and treatment) was also examined in relation to the uptake of cancer genetic testing. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to examine factors associated with knowledge and genetic testing to calculate predicted probability of undergoing genetic testing by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Of 3551 study participants, 37.8% reported having heard of genetic testing for cancer risk and 3.9% stated that they underwent cancer genetic testing. Being non-Hispanic Black (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.30-0.75) or Hispanic (OR=0.56, CI=0.35-0.90) was associated with lower odds of genetic testing knowledge. Although Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black respondents were more likely to perceive higher importance of genetic information versus non-Hispanic Whites, they had a lower predicted probability of cancer genetic testing.

CONCLUSION

Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults had lower knowledge and were less likely to undergo cancer genetic testing than non-Hispanic Whites. Further research is needed on sources of genetic testing information for racial and ethnic minorities and the barriers to accessing genetic testing to inform the development of effective cancer risk genetic testing promotion.

摘要

背景

基因检测有助于确定多种癌症的风险,并指导癌症的预防和治疗计划。尽管人们越来越关注精准癌症医学方面的差异,但公众对基因检测的认知以及不同种族和族裔进行癌症基因检测的情况尚未得到充分研究。

方法

我们分析了 2022 年对 2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查的数据。按种族和族裔比较了对癌症基因检测(例如 Lynch 综合征、BRCA1/2)的知识和利用情况。还研究了遗传信息对癌症护理(预防、检测和治疗)的重要性与接受癌症基因检测之间的关系。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来研究与知识和基因检测相关的因素,以计算按种族和族裔进行基因检测的预测概率。

结果

在 3551 名研究参与者中,37.8%的人听说过癌症风险的基因检测,3.9%的人表示他们接受了癌症基因检测。非西班牙裔黑人(OR=0.47,95%CI=0.30-0.75)或西班牙裔(OR=0.56,CI=0.35-0.90)的人进行基因检测的可能性较低。尽管西班牙裔或非西班牙裔黑人受访者比非西班牙裔白人更有可能认为遗传信息更重要,但他们进行癌症基因检测的预测概率较低。

结论

非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔成年人的基因检测知识较低,进行癌症基因检测的可能性也低于非西班牙裔白人。需要进一步研究针对少数族裔的基因检测信息来源,以及获取基因检测的障碍,以为制定有效的癌症风险基因检测推广策略提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b4/9870197/d2c40e98f578/40615_2023_1526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b4/9870197/a9615a7bf4f2/40615_2023_1526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b4/9870197/d2c40e98f578/40615_2023_1526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b4/9870197/a9615a7bf4f2/40615_2023_1526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b4/9870197/d2c40e98f578/40615_2023_1526_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk and Perceived Importance of Genetic Information Among US Population by Race and Ethnicity: a Cross-sectional Study.美国不同种族和族裔人群的癌症风险遗传检测和对遗传信息重要性的认知:一项横断面研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Feb;11(1):382-394. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01526-4. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.城乡和种族-民族之间对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认识差异。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 23;18(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5190-6.
3
Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and sources of information about germline cancer genetic testing in the U.S.A.: An analysis of the health information National Trends Survey System.美国关于生殖系癌症基因检测的知识、态度及信息来源的种族差异:健康信息国家趋势调查系统分析
Prev Med. 2024 Jan;178:107779. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107779. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Similarities and Differences in COVID-19 Awareness, Concern, and Symptoms by Race and Ethnicity in the United States: Cross-Sectional Survey.美国不同种族和族裔在新冠病毒疾病认知、担忧及症状方面的异同:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 10;22(7):e20001. doi: 10.2196/20001.
5
Racial and ethnic differences in perception of provider cultural competence among patients with depression and anxiety symptoms: a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis.抑郁和焦虑症状患者感知提供者文化能力的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性、基于人群、横断面分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00285-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
6
Trends in Cigar Use in the United States, 2002-2016: Diverging Trends by Race/Ethnicity.美国雪茄使用趋势,2002-2016 年:按种族/民族划分的趋势差异。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):583-587. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz060.
7
Racial Disparities in Shared Decision-Making and the Use of mHealth Technology Among Adults With Hypertension in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Study in the United States.种族差异在共享决策和使用移动医疗技术在高血压患者中的应用 2017-2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查:美国的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 13;25:e47566. doi: 10.2196/47566.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Genetic Testing at a Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中心的基因检测中的种族和民族差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06064-x. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Racial and ethnic differences in the adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国在采用预防性输卵管切除术降低卵巢癌发病风险方面的种族和民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):257.e1-257.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
10
Temporal Trends in Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Among US Adolescents by Sex and Race/Ethnicity, 1991-2019.1991 年至 2019 年美国青少年中按性别和种族/族裔划分的自杀意念和尝试的时间趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113513. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13513.

引用本文的文献

1
Beliefs and perceptions of genetic testing by clinical, demographic, and health characteristics: A U.S.-based study utilizing the health information national trends (HINTS) survey.基于临床、人口统计学和健康特征的基因检测信念与认知:一项利用美国健康信息国家趋势(HINTS)调查的美国研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Aug 8;57:103204. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103204. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Computational prediction of the pathogenic variants of arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase activating protein using Molecular Dynamics simulation.利用分子动力学模拟对花生四烯酸5-脂氧合酶激活蛋白的致病变异进行计算预测。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 30;20(7):e0329126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329126. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patient navigation for hereditary colorectal cancer: Design of a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of pathways to genetic counseling.遗传性结直肠癌患者导航:一项旨在确定遗传咨询途径有效性的随机对照试验设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May;116:106735. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106735. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
2
Negative cancer beliefs: Socioeconomic differences from the awareness and beliefs about cancer survey.消极癌症观念:来自癌症认知和观念调查的社会经济差异。
Psychooncology. 2021 Apr;30(4):471-477. doi: 10.1002/pon.5573. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
3
Communicating genetic information to family members: analysis of consent forms for diagnostic genomic sequencing.
Understanding the reasons for declining to participate in cancer genetics and genomic studies in the USA: a scoping review protocol.
了解美国拒绝参与癌症遗传学和基因组学研究的原因:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 30;15(4):e093998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093998.
4
Association between cancer screenings uptake and genetic testing for cancer risk among US adults: findings from HINTS 2017-2020.美国成年人癌症筛查接受情况与癌症风险基因检测之间的关联:2017 - 2020年健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的结果
J Community Genet. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00797-0.
5
How eHealth use and cancer information-seeking influence older adults' acceptance of genetic testing: Mediating roles of PIGI and cancer worry.电子健康的使用和癌症信息寻求如何影响老年人对基因检测的接受度:PIGI和癌症担忧的中介作用。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 31;11:20552076251317658. doi: 10.1177/20552076251317658. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Exploring the Role of Communication Asset Mapping (CAM) as a Strategy to Promote Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Information Within African American Communities.探索沟通资产映射(CAM)作为一种在非裔美国社区推广遗传性癌症风险评估信息的策略所发挥的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 8;22(1):75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010075.
7
Hereditary and clinical insights into paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma.副神经节瘤和嗜铬细胞瘤的遗传与临床见解
Endocr Oncol. 2024 Oct 29;4(1):e240029. doi: 10.1530/EO-24-0029. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
8
Raising awareness and education of genetic testing and counseling through fotonovelas among Latina women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.通过图文小说提高有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险的拉丁裔女性对基因检测和咨询的认识并开展相关教育。
J Community Genet. 2024 Oct;15(5):475-488. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00728-5. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
向家庭成员传达遗传信息:对诊断性基因组测序同意书的分析。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Sep;28(9):1160-1167. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0627-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
Colorectal cancer knowledge and screening adherence among low-income Hispanic employees.低收入西班牙裔员工的结直肠癌知识和筛查依从性。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Aug 1;34(4):400-414. doi: 10.1093/her/cyz013.
5
Data Resource Profile: The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).数据资源简介:美国国立癌症研究所的健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):17-17j. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz083.
6
Psychosocial, attitudinal, and demographic correlates of cancer-related germline genetic testing in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.2017年健康信息国家趋势调查中癌症相关种系基因检测的心理社会、态度和人口统计学相关因素。
J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):453-459. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-00405-4. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
Developing a genetic services assessment tool to inform quality improvement efforts in state genetic service delivery.开发一种遗传服务评估工具,为州遗传服务提供中的质量改进工作提供信息。
Genet Med. 2019 Apr;21(4):955-964. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0141-2. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
8
Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.评估美国人群的基因素养意识和知识差距:健康信息国家趋势调查结果
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(6):343-348. doi: 10.1159/000489117. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Trends and Gaps in Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests From 2007 to 2014.2007 年至 2014 年直接面向消费者的基因检测认知的趋势和差距。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun;54(6):806-813. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Underutilization and disparities in access to EGFR testing among Medicare patients with lung cancer from 2010 - 2013.2010 年至 2013 年间,医疗保险肺癌患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)检测利用不足以及获得检测的机会存在差异。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4190-3.