Amity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201301, UP, India.
NIBEC, Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, Belfast BT37 0QB, UK.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Sep 1;90:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.072. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
In the present work, a comparative study was performed between single-walled carbon nanotubes and multi-walled carbon nanotubes coated gold printed circuit board electrodes for glucose detection. Various characterization techniques were demonstrated in order to compare the modified electrodes viz. cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and chrono-amperometry. Results revealed that single-walled carbon nanotubes outperformed multi-walled carbon nanotubes and proved to be a better sensing interface for glucose detection. The single-walled carbon nanotubes coated gold printed circuit board electrodes showed a wide linear sensing range (1 mM to 100 mM) with detection limit of 0.1 mM with response time of 5 s while multi-walled carbon nanotubes coated printed circuit board gold electrodes showed linear sensing range (1 mM to 100 mM) with detection limit of 0.1 mM with response time of 5 s. This work provided low cost sensors with enhanced sensitivity, fast response time and reliable results for glucose detection which increased the affordability of such tests in remote areas. In addition, the comparative results confirmed that single-walled carbon nanotubes modified electrodes can be exploited for better amplification signal as compared to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.
在本工作中,对涂金印刷电路板电极的单壁碳纳米管和多壁碳纳米管进行了葡萄糖检测的对比研究。为了比较修饰电极,展示了各种特性化技术,如循环伏安法、电化学阻抗谱和计时安培法。结果表明,单壁碳纳米管优于多壁碳纳米管,是葡萄糖检测的更好传感界面。涂金印刷电路板电极的单壁碳纳米管显示出较宽的线性传感范围(1mM 至 100mM),检测限为 0.1mM,响应时间为 5s,而多壁碳纳米管涂覆印刷电路板金电极显示出线性传感范围(1mM 至 100mM),检测限为 0.1mM,响应时间为 5s。这项工作为葡萄糖检测提供了低成本传感器,具有增强的灵敏度、快速的响应时间和可靠的结果,从而提高了此类测试在偏远地区的可负担性。此外,对比结果证实,与多壁碳纳米管相比,单壁碳纳米管修饰电极可用于更好地放大信号。