• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗中的患者安全:对国家严重事件数据库报告的混合方法研究。

Patient safety in palliative care: A mixed-methods study of reports to a national database of serious incidents.

机构信息

1 Department of Paediatric Surgery, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.

2 King's College, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1353-1362. doi: 10.1177/0269216318776846. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1177/0269216318776846
PMID:29856273
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving palliative care are vulnerable to patient safety incidents but little is known about the extent of harm caused or the origins of unsafe care in this population.

AIM

To quantify and qualitatively analyse serious incident reports in order to understand the causes and impact of unsafe care in a population receiving palliative care.

DESIGN

A mixed-methods approach was used. Following quantification of type of incidents and their location, a qualitative analysis using a modified framework method was used to interpret themes in reports to examine the underlying causes and the nature of resultant harms.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Reports to a national database of 'serious incidents requiring investigation' involving patients receiving palliative care in the National Health Service (NHS) in England during the 12-year period, April 2002 to March 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 475 reports were identified: 266 related to pressure ulcers, 91 to medication errors, 46 to falls, 21 to healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs), 18 were other instances of disturbed dying, 14 were allegations against health professions, 8 transfer incidents, 6 suicides and 5 other concerns. The frequency of report types differed according to the care setting. Underlying causes included lack of palliative care experience, under-resourcing and poor service coordination. Resultant harms included worsened symptoms, disrupted dying, serious injury and hastened death.

CONCLUSION

Unsafe care presents a risk of significant harm to patients receiving palliative care. Improvements in the coordination of care delivery alongside wider availability of specialist palliative care support may reduce this risk.

摘要

背景

接受姑息治疗的患者容易发生患者安全事件,但人们对该人群中不安全护理造成的伤害程度或不安全护理的根源知之甚少。

目的

定量和定性分析严重事件报告,以了解接受姑息治疗的人群中不安全护理的原因和影响。

设计

采用混合方法。在对事件类型及其位置进行量化后,使用修改后的框架方法进行定性分析,以解释报告中的主题,从而检查不安全护理的根本原因和由此产生的伤害性质。

设置和参与者

报告涉及英格兰国民保健服务(NHS)中接受姑息治疗的患者在 12 年期间(2002 年 4 月至 2014 年 3 月)发生的“需要调查的严重事件”的国家数据库。

结果

共确定了 475 份报告:266 份与压疮有关,91 份与用药错误有关,46 份与跌倒有关,21 份与医疗保健相关感染(HAI)有关,18 份与其他异常死亡有关,14 份与卫生专业人员有关,8 份与转移事件有关,6 例自杀和 5 例其他关注。报告类型的频率因护理环境而异。根本原因包括缺乏姑息治疗经验、资源不足和服务协调不善。由此产生的伤害包括症状恶化、死亡过程中断、严重伤害和加速死亡。

结论

不安全的护理对接受姑息治疗的患者构成了重大伤害风险。改善护理服务的协调以及更广泛地提供专业姑息治疗支持可能会降低这种风险。

相似文献

1
Patient safety in palliative care: A mixed-methods study of reports to a national database of serious incidents.姑息治疗中的患者安全:对国家严重事件数据库报告的混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1353-1362. doi: 10.1177/0269216318776846. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
2
Patient safety incident reports related to traditional Japanese Kampo medicines: medication errors and adverse drug events in a university hospital for a ten-year period.与日本传统汉方药相关的患者安全事件报告:一所大学医院十年间的用药错误和药物不良事件
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Dec 21;17(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-2051-2.
3
Learning from patient safety incidents involving acutely sick adults in hospital assessment units in England and Wales: a mixed methods analysis for quality improvement.从英格兰和威尔士医院评估病房中急性病成年人的患者安全事件中学习:用于质量改进的混合方法分析。
J R Soc Med. 2021 Dec;114(12):563-574. doi: 10.1177/01410768211032589. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
5
Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports.老年人不安全初级保健的来源:对患者安全事件报告的混合方法分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.
6
Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.英格兰和威尔士初级医疗中涉及患病儿童的患者安全事件:一项混合方法分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.
7
Health and social care-associated harm amongst vulnerable children in primary care: mixed methods analysis of national safety reports.初级保健中弱势儿童的健康和社会保健相关伤害:国家安全报告的混合方法分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Aug;105(8):731-737. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318406. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
9
Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.利用来自英格兰和威尔士的国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)数据对出院后用药安全事件的性质和促成因素进行分析:一项多方法研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Mar 16;14:20420986231154365. doi: 10.1177/20420986231154365. eCollection 2023.
10
The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales.与医疗信息技术故障相关的 2627 起患者安全事件的影响和可预防措施:对英格兰和威尔士 10 年来事件报告的回顾性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jul;1(3):e127-e135. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30057-3. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Invisible harm in patient safety: a framework and definition for preventable psychological harm in cancer care.患者安全中的无形伤害:癌症护理中可预防心理伤害的框架与定义
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 26;14(3):e003466. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003466.
2
Multiple points of system failure underpin continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents in palliative care: A mixed methods analysis.多系统故障是姑息治疗中持续皮下输注安全事件的基础:一项混合方法分析。
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):7-21. doi: 10.1177/02692163241287639. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
Feasibility of prospective error reporting in home palliative care: A mixed methods study.
居家姑息治疗中前瞻性错误报告的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/02692163241288774. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
4
Adverse events at the end of life of hospital patients with or without a condition relevant for palliative care: a nationwide retrospective record review study in the Netherlands.荷兰全国范围内回顾性病历审查研究:有无姑息治疗相关条件的住院患者生命终末期不良事件。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 10;23(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01461-z.
5
A survey of skin failure perceptions amongst pressure injury management staff in China: A cross-sectional study.中国压疮管理工作人员对皮肤衰竭认知的调查:一项横断面研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 May;21(5):e14890. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14890.
6
Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities.重大疾病中的不确定性:一项全国性跨学科共识实践,旨在确定临床研究重点。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0289522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289522. eCollection 2024.
7
Analysis of applying a patient safety taxonomy to patient and clinician-reported incident reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.应用患者安全分类法分析 COVID-19 大流行期间患者和临床医生报告的不良事件报告:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02057-6.
8
Patient Safety in Palliative Care at the End of Life from the Perspective of Complex Thinking.从复杂思维角度看临终姑息治疗中的患者安全
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 15;11(14):2030. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142030.
9
Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.利用来自英格兰和威尔士的国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)数据对出院后用药安全事件的性质和促成因素进行分析:一项多方法研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Mar 16;14:20420986231154365. doi: 10.1177/20420986231154365. eCollection 2023.
10
How Safe Do Dying People Feel at Home? Patients' Perception of Safety While Receiving Specialist Community Palliative Care.临终者在家中感到多安全?接受专科社区姑息治疗的患者对安全的感知。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Aug;40(8):829-836. doi: 10.1177/10499091221140075. Epub 2022 Nov 17.