Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, NY, USA.
Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;24(11):1655-1667. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0068-7. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Human genome-wide association studies (GWAS), transcriptome analyses of animal models, and candidate gene studies have advanced our understanding of the genetic architecture of aggressive behaviors. However, each of these methods presents unique limitations. To generate a more confident and comprehensive view of the complex genetics underlying aggression, we undertook an integrated, cross-species approach. We focused on human and rodent models to derive eight gene lists from three main categories of genetic evidence: two sets of genes identified in GWAS studies, four sets implicated by transcriptome-wide studies of rodent models, and two sets of genes with causal evidence from online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM) and knockout (KO) mice reports. These gene sets were evaluated for overlap and pathway enrichment to extract their similarities and differences. We identified enriched common pathways such as the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway, axon guidance, reelin signaling in neurons, and ERK/MAPK signaling. Also, individual genes were ranked based on their cumulative weights to quantify their importance as risk factors for aggressive behavior, which resulted in 40 top-ranked and highly interconnected genes. The results of our cross-species and integrated approach provide insights into the genetic etiology of aggression.
人类全基因组关联研究(GWAS)、动物模型的转录组分析和候选基因研究,都增进了我们对攻击性行为遗传结构的理解。然而,这些方法各有其局限性。为了更有信心、更全面地了解攻击行为背后复杂的遗传基础,我们采取了一种综合的、跨物种的方法。我们专注于人类和啮齿动物模型,从三个主要的遗传证据类别中得出了 8 个基因列表:GWAS 研究确定的两组基因、啮齿动物模型的转录组全基因组研究暗示的四组基因,以及在线孟德尔遗传人体内(OMIM)和敲除(KO)小鼠报告中具有因果证据的两组基因。我们评估了这些基因集的重叠和通路富集,以提取它们的相似性和差异。我们确定了丰富的共同通路,如 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)信号通路、轴突导向、神经元中的 reelin 信号通路和 ERK/MAPK 信号通路。此外,还根据累积权重对单个基因进行了排名,以量化它们作为攻击性行为风险因素的重要性,这导致了 40 个排名靠前且高度相互关联的基因。我们跨物种和综合方法的结果为攻击性行为的遗传病因学提供了一些见解。