Hirono Seiko, Kawai Manabu, Okada Ken-Ichi, Miyazawa Motoki, Shimizu Atsushi, Kitahata Yuji, Ueno Masaki, Shimokawa Toshio, Nakao Akimasa, Yamaue Hiroki
Second Department of Surgery School of Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Clinical Study Support Center School of Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017 Jun 7;1(3):208-218. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12013. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Mesenteric approach is an artery-first approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). In the present study, we evaluated clinical and oncological benefits of this procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the pancreas head. Between 2000 and 2015, 237 consecutive PDAC patients underwent PD. Among them, 72 experienced the mesenteric approach (mesenteric group) and 165 the conventional approach (conventional group). A matched-pairs group consisted of 116 patients (58 patients in each group) matched for age, gender, resectability status, and neoadjuvant therapy. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups in unmatched- and matched-pair analyses. Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the mesenteric group than in the conventional group in both resectable PDAC (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC) on unmatched- and matched-pairs analyses (R-PDAC, unmatched: 312.5 vs 510 mL, =.008; matched: 312.5 vs 501.5 mL, =.023; BR-PDAC, unmatched: 507.5 vs 935 mL, <.001; matched: 507.5 vs 920 mL, =.003). Negative surgical margins (R0) and overall survival (OS) rates in the mesenteric group were better in R-PDAC patients (R0 rates, unmatched: 100% vs 87.7%, =.044; matched: 100% vs 86.7%, =.045; OS, unmatched: =.008, matched: =.021), although there were no significant differences in BR-PDAC patients. Mesenteric approach might reduce blood loss by early ligation of the vessels to the pancreatic head. Furthermore, it might increase R0 rate, leading to improvement of survival for R-PDAC patients. However, R0 and survival rates could not be improved only by the mesenteric approach for BR-PDAC patients. Therefore, effective multidisciplinary treatment is essential to improve survival in BR-PDAC patients.
肠系膜入路是胰十二指肠切除术(PD)中一种先处理动脉的入路方式。在本研究中,我们评估了该手术方式对胰头导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的临床及肿瘤学获益情况。2000年至2015年期间,237例连续性PDAC患者接受了PD手术。其中,72例采用肠系膜入路(肠系膜组),165例采用传统入路(传统组)。一个配对组由116例患者组成(每组58例),根据年龄、性别、可切除性状态和新辅助治疗情况进行配对。在非配对和配对分析中比较了两组的手术和肿瘤学结局。在非配对和配对分析中,肠系膜组在可切除性PDAC(R-PDAC)和临界可切除性PDAC(BR-PDAC)中的术中失血量均低于传统组(R-PDAC,非配对:312.5 vs 510 mL,P = 0.008;配对:312.5 vs 501.5 mL,P = 0.023;BR-PDAC,非配对:507.5 vs 935 mL,P < 0.001;配对:507.5 vs 920 mL,P = 0.003)。在R-PDAC患者中,肠系膜组的阴性手术切缘(R0)率和总生存率(OS)更好(R0率,非配对:100% vs 87.7%,P = 0.044;配对:100% vs 86.7%,P = 0.045;OS,非配对:P = 0.008,配对:P = 0.021),尽管在BR-PDAC患者中无显著差异。肠系膜入路可能通过早期结扎胰头血管减少失血量。此外,它可能提高R0率,从而改善R-PDAC患者的生存率。然而,对于BR-PDAC患者,仅通过肠系膜入路无法提高R0率和生存率。因此,有效的多学科治疗对于提高BR-PDAC患者的生存率至关重要。