Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Semin Liver Dis. 2018 May;38(2):103-111. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655776. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
With the rapid growth of biomedical literature, there is increasing need to make meaningful inferences from a comprehensive and complex body of evidence. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses offer an objective and summative approach to synthesize knowledge and critically appraise evidence to inform clinical practice. Systematic reviews also help identify key knowledge gaps for future investigation. In this review, the authors provide a step-by-step approach to conducting a systematic review. These include: (1) formulating a focused and clinically-relevant question; (2) designing a detailed review protocol with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria; (3) performing a systematic literature search of multiple databases and unpublished data, in consultation with a medical librarian, to identify relevant studies; (4) meticulous data abstraction by at least two sets of investigators independently; (5) assessing risk of bias in individual studies; (6) quantitative synthesis with meta-analysis; and (7) critically and transparently ascertaining quality of evidence.
随着生物医学文献的快速增长,人们越来越需要从全面而复杂的证据中得出有意义的推论。有或没有荟萃分析的系统评价为综合知识和批判性评估证据以指导临床实践提供了一种客观和总结性的方法。系统评价还有助于确定未来研究的关键知识空白。在这篇综述中,作者提供了一种逐步进行系统评价的方法。这些方法包括:(1)制定一个重点突出且具有临床相关性的问题;(2)设计一个详细的审查方案,其中包括明确的纳入和排除标准;(3)在医学图书馆员的协助下,对多个数据库和未发表的数据进行系统文献检索,以确定相关研究;(4)至少由两组调查员独立进行细致的数据提取;(5)评估个体研究的偏倚风险;(6)进行荟萃分析的定量综合;以及(7)批判性和透明地确定证据的质量。