• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交叉分类随机效应模型在荟萃分析中应用的演示与评估。

A demonstration and evaluation of the use of cross-classified random-effects models for meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, IICK Building, Box 1.33, Etienne Sabelaan 51, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.

Imec-ITEC, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1286-1304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1063-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-018-1063-2
PMID:29873036
Abstract

It is common for the primary studies in meta-analyses to report multiple effect sizes, generating dependence among them. Hierarchical three-level models have been proposed as a means to deal with this dependency. Sometimes, however, dependency may be due to multiple random factors, and random factors are not necessarily nested, but rather may be crossed. For instance, effect sizes may belong to different studies, and, at the same time, effect sizes might represent the effects on different outcomes. Cross-classified random-effects models (CCREMs) can be used to model this nonhierarchical dependent structure. In this article, we explore by means of a simulation study the performance of CCREMs in comparison with the use of other meta-analytic models and estimation procedures, including the use of three- and two-level models and robust variance estimation. We also evaluated the performance of CCREMs when the underlying data were generated using a multivariate model. The results indicated that, whereas the quality of fixed-effect estimates is unaffected by any misspecification in the model, the standard error estimates of the mean effect size and of the moderator variables' effects, as well as the variance component estimates, are biased under some conditions. Applying CCREMs led to unbiased fixed-effect and variance component estimates, outperforming the other models. Even when a CCREM was not used to generate the data, applying the CCREM yielded sound parameter estimates and inferences.

摘要

在荟萃分析中,主要研究通常会报告多个效应大小,从而产生它们之间的依赖性。分层三级模型已被提出作为处理这种依赖性的一种方法。然而,有时依赖性可能是由于多个随机因素引起的,并且随机因素不一定嵌套,而是可能交叉。例如,效应大小可能属于不同的研究,同时,效应大小可能代表对不同结果的影响。交叉分类随机效应模型(CCREM)可用于对这种非层次依赖结构进行建模。在本文中,我们通过模拟研究来探讨 CCREM 与其他荟萃分析模型和估计程序(包括使用三水平和两水平模型以及稳健方差估计)的性能比较。我们还评估了当使用多元模型生成基础数据时 CCREM 的性能。结果表明,虽然固定效应估计的质量不受模型任何不恰当指定的影响,但在某些条件下,平均效应大小和调节变量效应的标准误差估计以及方差分量估计会有偏差。应用 CCREM 可以得到无偏的固定效应和方差分量估计,表现优于其他模型。即使 CCREM 没有用于生成数据,应用 CCREM 也可以得到可靠的参数估计和推断。

相似文献

1
A demonstration and evaluation of the use of cross-classified random-effects models for meta-analysis.交叉分类随机效应模型在荟萃分析中应用的演示与评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1286-1304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1063-2.
2
The Impacts of Ignoring a Crossed Factor in Analyzing Cross-Classified Data.在分析交叉分类数据时忽略交叉因素的影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):182-212. doi: 10.1080/00273170902794214.
3
Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.评估元回归方法以检验与依存效应大小的调节关系:一项蒙特卡罗模拟。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):435-450. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1245. Epub 2017 May 28.
4
The Impact of Inappropriate Modeling of Cross-Classified Data Structures.交叉分类数据结构不当建模的影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Dec 1;41(4):473-97. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_3.
5
The impact of omitting the interaction between crossed factors in cross-classified random effects modelling.忽略交叉分类随机效应模型中交叉因素相互作用的影响。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 Feb;63(Pt 1):1-15. doi: 10.1348/000711008X398968. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
6
Modern applications of cross-classified random effects models in social and behavioral research: Illustration with R package PLmixed.交叉分类随机效应模型在社会和行为研究中的现代应用:以R包PLmixed为例
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 24;13:976964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976964. eCollection 2022.
7
A Comparison of Fixed-Effects and Random-Effects Models for Multivariate Meta-Analysis Using an SEM Approach.采用 SEM 方法对多元荟萃分析中的固定效应模型和随机效应模型进行比较。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 Nov-Dec;55(6):839-854. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1689348. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
8
The impact of multiple endpoint dependency on Q and I(2) in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中终点相关性对 Q 和 I(2)的影响。
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Sep;5(3):235-53. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1110. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
9
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Estimating outcome-specific effects in meta-analyses of multiple outcomes: A simulation study.对多项结果荟萃分析中特定结果的效应估计:一项模拟研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Apr;53(2):702-717. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01459-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Robustness assessment of regressions using cluster analysis typologies: a bootstrap procedure with application in state sequence analysis.使用聚类分析类型学进行回归的稳健性评估:一种在状态序列分析中的应用的自助程序。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02435-8.
2
Harnessing Available Evidence in Single-Case Experimental Studies: The Use of Multilevel Meta-Analysis.利用单病例实验研究中的现有证据:多层次荟萃分析的应用。
Psychol Belg. 2024 Oct 25;64(1):166-184. doi: 10.5334/pb.1307. eCollection 2024.
3
Global changes and their environmental stressors have a significant impact on soil biodiversity-A meta-analysis.
全球变化及其环境压力源对土壤生物多样性有重大影响——一项荟萃分析。
iScience. 2024 Jul 20;27(9):110540. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110540. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.
4
Adrenocortical and autonomic cross-system regulation in youth: A meta-analysis.青少年肾上腺皮质和自主神经系统的交叉系统调节:一项荟萃分析。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2024 Jan;159. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2023.106416. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Survey mode and nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis based on the data from the international social survey programme waves 1996-2018 and the European social survey rounds 1 to 9.调查模式和无回应偏差:基于国际社会调查计划 1996-2018 年波次和欧洲社会调查轮次 1 至 9 年的数据的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0283092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283092. eCollection 2023.
6
Interactions between insect vectors and plant pathogens span the parasitism-mutualism continuum.昆虫媒介与植物病原体之间的相互作用跨越了寄生-共生连续统。
Biol Lett. 2023 Mar;19(3):20220453. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0453. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
7
Effect of Natural Disaster-Related Prenatal Maternal Stress on Child Development and Health: A Meta-Analytic Review.自然灾害相关产前母体应激对儿童发育和健康的影响:一项荟萃分析综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;18(16):8332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168332.
8
Reply to second letter to the editor about the article "The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis".对编辑就《膝关节疼痛患者在阻力训练中添加血流限制:一项系统评价与荟萃分析》一文的第二封来信的回复
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):564-565. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis with Non-Independent Effect Sizes.非独立效应量的元分析指南。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2019 Dec;29(4):387-396. doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6. Epub 2019 Aug 24.