Cortés Constanza, Marcos Ricard
Grup de Mutagènesi, Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Edifici C, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
Grup de Mutagènesi, Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Edifici C, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, ISCIII, Spain.
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2018 Jul;831:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
The presence of water disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in tap water, resulting from disinfection processes involving chlorination or chloramination, increases the mutagenicity of the water and may pose adverse health effects. The topic was reviewed by DeMarini and coworkers in 2007. Here, we review research on the genotoxicity of DBPs published since that time. Studies, primarily using the Salmonella mutagenicity assay, have continued to show that chlorination or chloramination of source waters results in finished, tap, or swimming pool/spa water that is more mutagenic than the original source water. The genotoxic potencies of DBPs in both bacterial and mammalian cells generally rank as iodinated > brominated > chlorinated. Several DBPs are genotoxic in vivo in plants as well as in animals such as the worm Caenorhabditis elegans and the zebrafish Danio rerio. Studies primarily using the comet assay in mammalian cells have identified several non-regulated DBPs as genotoxic. However, the comet assay detects DNA damage that is generally repaired by the cells; thus, genotoxicity data more relevant to persistent mutations, such as chromosomal or gene mutations, are needed for these DBPs. Recent molecular epidemiology has indicated that activation of brominated trihalomethanes by the enzyme GSTT1 and the lack of metabolism of haloacetic acids by a variant of enzyme GSTZ1 are likely causative mechanisms for bladder cancer associated with exposure to chlorinated water. Further studies, especially in vivo, are needed to determine the ability of various DBPs, especially unregulated ones, to induce both gene as well as chromosomal mutations. Such investigations, along with additional molecular epidemiology studies, are required for a comprehensive understanding of the genotoxic and carcinogenic risks associated with DBP exposure.
自来水消毒副产物(DBPs)的存在是由涉及氯化或氯胺化的消毒过程导致的,这会增加水的致突变性,并可能对健康产生不利影响。2007年,DeMarini及其同事对该主题进行了综述。在此,我们回顾自那时以来发表的关于DBPs遗传毒性的研究。主要使用沙门氏菌致突变性试验的研究继续表明,源水的氯化或氯胺化会导致成品水、自来水或游泳池/水疗池水中的致突变性高于原始源水。DBPs在细菌和哺乳动物细胞中的遗传毒性强度一般排序为:碘化>溴化>氯化。几种DBPs在植物以及动物体内(如线虫秀丽隐杆线虫和斑马鱼)具有遗传毒性。主要在哺乳动物细胞中使用彗星试验的研究已确定几种未受监管的DBPs具有遗传毒性。然而,彗星试验检测到的DNA损伤通常会被细胞修复;因此,对于这些DBPs,需要更与持久性突变(如染色体或基因突变)相关的遗传毒性数据。最近的分子流行病学表明,溴化三卤甲烷由GSTT1酶激活以及卤乙酸由GSTZ1酶变体缺乏代谢可能是与接触氯化水相关的膀胱癌的致病机制。需要进一步的研究,尤其是体内研究,以确定各种DBPs,特别是未受监管的DBPs诱导基因和染色体突变的能力。为了全面了解与DBP暴露相关的遗传毒性和致癌风险,需要进行此类调查以及更多的分子流行病学研究。