Suppr超能文献

使用合成骨模型测试椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度:双层泡沫模型是否更能代表椎体?

Testing Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Using Synthetic Bone Models: Is a Bilayer Foam Model a Better Representation of Vertebra?

作者信息

Varghese Vicky, Krishnan Venkatesh, Saravana Kumar Gurunathan

机构信息

Division of Biomedical Devices and Technology, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.

Spinal Disorder Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):398-406. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.398. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study.

PURPOSE

A new biomechanical model of the vertebra has been developed that accounts for the inhomogeneity of bone and the contribution of the pedicle toward the holding strength of a pedicle screw.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Pullout strength studies are typically carried out on rigid polyurethane foams that represent the homogeneous vertebral framework of the spine. However, the contribution of the pedicle region, which contributes to the inhomogeneity in this framework, has not been considered in previous investigations. Therefore, we propose a new biomechanical model that can account for the vertebral inhomogeneity, especially the contribution of the pedicles toward the pullout strength of the pedicle screw.

METHODS

A bilayer foam model was developed by joining two foams representing the pedicle and the vertebra. The results of the pullout strength tests performed on the foam models were compared with those from the tests performed on the cadaver lumbar vertebra.

RESULTS

Significant differences ( <0.05) were observed between the pullout strength of the pedicle screw in extremely osteoporotic (0.18±0.11 kN), osteoporotic (0.37±0.14 kN), and normal (0.97±0.4 kN) cadaver vertebra. In the monolayer model, significant differences ( <0.05) were observed in pullout strength between extremely osteoporotic (0.3±0.02 kN), osteoporotic (0.65±0.12 kN), and normal (0.99±0.04 kN) bone model. However, the bilayer foam model exhibited no significant differences ( >0.05) in the pullout strength of pedicle screws between osteoporotic (0.85±0.08 kN) and extremely osteoporotic bone models (0.94±0.08 kN), but there was a significant difference ( <0.05) between osteoporotic (0.94±0.08 kN) and normal bone models (1.19±0.05 kN). There were no significant differences ( >0.05) in pullout strength between cadaver and bilayer foam model in normal bones.

CONCLUSIONS

The new synthetic bone model that reflects the contribution of the pedicles to the pullout strength of the pedicle screws could provide a more efficacious means of testing pedicle-screw pullout strength. The bilayer model can match the pullout strength value of normal lumbar vertebra bone whereas the monolayer foam model was able to match that of the extremely osteoporotic lumbar vertebra.

摘要

研究设计

一项生物力学研究。

目的

已开发出一种新的椎体生物力学模型,该模型考虑了骨的不均匀性以及椎弓根对椎弓根螺钉把持力的贡献。

文献综述

拔出强度研究通常在代表脊柱均匀椎体框架的刚性聚氨酯泡沫上进行。然而,先前的研究未考虑椎弓根区域对该框架不均匀性的贡献。因此,我们提出一种新的生物力学模型,该模型能够考虑椎体的不均匀性,尤其是椎弓根对椎弓根螺钉拔出强度的贡献。

方法

通过连接代表椎弓根和椎体的两种泡沫材料建立双层泡沫模型。将在泡沫模型上进行的拔出强度测试结果与在尸体腰椎上进行的测试结果进行比较。

结果

在极度骨质疏松(0.18±0.11 kN)、骨质疏松(0.37±0.14 kN)和正常(0.97±0.4 kN)的尸体椎体中,观察到椎弓根螺钉拔出强度之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。在单层模型中,在极度骨质疏松(0.3±0.02 kN)、骨质疏松(0.65±0.12 kN)和正常(0.99±0.04 kN)的骨模型之间,拔出强度也观察到显著差异(P<0.05)。然而,双层泡沫模型在骨质疏松(0.85±0.08 kN)和极度骨质疏松骨模型(0.94±0.08 kN)之间的椎弓根螺钉拔出强度上没有显著差异(P>0.05),但在骨质疏松(0.94±0.08 kN)和正常骨模型(1.19±0.05 kN)之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。在正常骨中,尸体模型和双层泡沫模型之间的拔出强度没有显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

反映椎弓根对椎弓根螺钉拔出强度贡献的新型合成骨模型可为测试椎弓根螺钉拔出强度提供更有效的方法。双层模型能够匹配正常腰椎骨的拔出强度值,而单层泡沫模型能够匹配极度骨质疏松腰椎的拔出强度值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d478/6002167/47ac2fc06eea/asj-2018-12-3-398f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验