Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
Higher treatment facility (TF) volume has been linked with improved oncologic treatment outcomes.
To determine the association between TF volume and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all patients with mRCC with survival data available (2004-2013, cohort A). Overall survival was assessed based on TF volumes, and increasingly narrow inclusion criteria were used to confirm the cohort A association: cohort B=mRCC patients with active treatment; cohort C=mRCC patients with systemic therapy; cohort D=mRCC patients with systemic therapy at the reporting institution; and cohort E=mRCC patients with systemic therapy at the reporting institution with known liver and lung metastatic status. Sensitivity analyses were also performed on subcohorts of mRCC who never underwent a nephrectomy (C1, D1, and E1).
The effect of volume on time to death (from any cause) was determined using Cox regression models, adjusting for multiple clinical pathologic factors. Volume effects (assessed continuously) were modeled using flexible cubic splines, and adjusted 1-yr survivals were obtained from the model.
A total of 41 836 mRCC patients were treated at 1222 TFs. The median age was 65 yr. Of the patients, 66% were men and 79% had clear cell mRCC. Median TF volume was 2.2 patients per year (pts/yr). Across all cohorts, higher TF volume was associated with improved outcomes. Adjusted 1-yr survival in cohort A was 0.36 at 2 pts/yr, 0.39 at 5 pts/yr, 0.42 at 10 pts/yr, and 0.46 at 20 pts/yr, with similar magnitudes of effect in cohorts B-E. Limitations include the retrospective nature of NCDB analysis and the lack of information on treatment regimens used at specific facilities, which may explain mechanisms of effects.
Higher facility volume is associated with improvements in survival for patients being treated for mRCC. Steps should be taken to standardize management of mRCC patients, such as evidence-based pathway development, clinical trial access, and multidisciplinary resource availability at lower-volume TFs.
In this report, we analyzed a large cancer database and found that patients with metastatic kidney cancer survived longer if they were managed at facilities that treated a higher volume of such patients. This information can help find the best treatment environment for patients with metastatic kidney cancer.
更高的治疗机构(TF)容量与改善肿瘤治疗结果有关。
确定转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的 TF 容量与总生存率之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:国家癌症数据库(NCDB)被查询了所有有生存数据的 mRCC 患者(2004-2013 年,队列 A)。根据 TF 容量评估总生存率,并使用越来越窄的纳入标准来确认队列 A 的关联:队列 B=mRCC 接受积极治疗的患者;队列 C=mRCC 接受系统治疗的患者;队列 D=mRCC 接受报告机构系统治疗的患者;队列 E=mRCC 接受报告机构系统治疗且已知肝和肺转移状态的患者。还对从未接受过肾切除术的 mRCC 亚组进行了敏感性分析(C1、D1 和 E1)。
使用 Cox 回归模型确定容量对任何原因导致的死亡时间(从任何原因)的影响,同时调整了多个临床病理因素。使用灵活的三次样条对容量影响(连续评估)进行建模,并从模型中获得调整后的 1 年生存率。
共 41836 例 mRCC 患者在 1222 个 TF 中接受治疗。中位年龄为 65 岁。患者中,66%为男性,79%为透明细胞 mRCC。中位 TF 容量为每年 2.2 例患者(pts/yr)。在所有队列中,较高的 TF 容量与改善的结果相关。队列 A 的调整后 1 年生存率为 2 个 pts/yr 时为 0.36,5 个 pts/yr 时为 0.39,10 个 pts/yr 时为 0.42,20 个 pts/yr 时为 0.46,在队列 B-E 中也有类似的影响幅度。局限性包括 NCDB 分析的回顾性性质以及缺乏特定机构使用的治疗方案信息,这可能解释了影响机制。
较高的机构容量与接受 mRCC 治疗的患者的生存率提高有关。应采取措施使 mRCC 患者的管理标准化,例如制定基于证据的途径、获得临床试验机会以及在低容量 TF 中提供多学科资源。
在本报告中,我们分析了一个大型癌症数据库,发现转移性肾细胞癌患者如果在治疗此类患者数量较高的医疗机构接受治疗,其生存期更长。此信息可以帮助找到转移性肾细胞癌患者的最佳治疗环境。