Cognitive Science.
School of Psychology.
Psychol Bull. 2018 Oct;144(10):981-1001. doi: 10.1037/bul0000150. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
The authors present an approach to the coordination of eye movements and locomotion in naturalistic steering tasks. It is based on recent empirical research, in particular, on driver eye movements, that poses challenges for existing accounts of how we visually steer a course. They first analyze how the ideas of feedback and feedforward processes and internal models are treated in control theoretical steering models within vision science and engineering, which share an underlying architecture but have historically developed in very separate ways. The authors then show how these traditions can be naturally (re)integrated with each other and with contemporary neuroscience, to better understand the skill and gaze strategies involved. They then propose a conceptual model that (a) gives a unified account to the coordination of gaze and steering control, (b) incorporates higher-level path planning, and (c) draws on the literature on paired forward and inverse models in predictive control. Although each of these (a-c) has been considered before (also in the context of driving), integrating them into a single framework and the authors' multiple waypoint identification hypothesis within that framework are novel. The proposed hypothesis is relevant to all forms of visually guided locomotion. (PsycINFO Database Record
作者提出了一种在自然转向任务中协调眼球运动和运动的方法。它基于最近的实证研究,特别是驾驶员的眼球运动,这些研究对我们如何通过视觉来引导航向的现有解释提出了挑战。他们首先分析了反馈和前馈过程以及内部模型的思想在视觉科学和工程中的控制理论转向模型中是如何被处理的,这些模型具有相同的基本结构,但历史上是通过非常不同的方式发展起来的。然后,作者展示了如何将这些传统与彼此以及当代神经科学自然地(重新)整合在一起,以更好地理解所涉及的技能和注视策略。然后,他们提出了一个概念模型,该模型(a)为注视和转向控制的协调提供了统一的解释,(b)纳入了更高层次的路径规划,(c)借鉴了预测控制中关于成对前向和反向模型的文献。尽管这些(a-c)之前都有过考虑(也在驾驶的背景下),但将它们整合到一个单一的框架中,以及作者在该框架内的多路径点识别假设是新颖的。所提出的假设与所有形式的视觉引导运动都有关。