Hanna Jeff, Pulvermüller Friedemann
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Institute for German and Dutch Philology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 May 28;12:219. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00219. eCollection 2018.
Separable affix verbs consist of a stem and a derivational affix, which, in some languages can appear together or in discontinuous, distributed form, e.g., German "aufgreifen" and "greifen … auf" ["up-pick(ing)" and "pick … up"]. Certain stems can combine with only certain affixes. However, many such combinations are evaluated not as clearly correct or incorrect, but frequently take an intermediate status with participants rating them ambiguously. Here, we mapped brain responses to combinations of verb stems and affixes realized in short sentences, including more and less common particle verbs, borderline acceptable combinations and clear violations. Event-related potential responses to discontinuous particle verbs were obtained for five affixes re-combined with 10 verb stems, situated within short, German sentences, i.e., "sie
可分离词缀动词由一个词干和一个派生词缀组成,在某些语言中,它们可以一起出现,也可以以不连续的、分散的形式出现,例如,德语中的“aufgreifen”和“greifen … auf”(“向上抓取”和“抓取……向上”)。某些词干只能与某些词缀组合。然而,许多这样的组合并非被明确地判定为正确或错误,而是常常处于一种中间状态,参与者对它们的评价模棱两可。在这里,我们描绘了大脑对短句中动词词干和词缀组合的反应,包括常见程度不同的小品词动词、边缘可接受的组合以及明显的违规情况。针对五个词缀与10个动词词干重新组合形成的不连续小品词动词,在德语短句“sie <词干>en es <词缀>”(英语:“they <词干> it <词缀>”)中获得了事件相关电位反应。通过对刺激的行为评分和基于语料库的概率测量来评估组合的一致性。额叶N400的大小与词干和词缀之间的不一致程度相关,这两种测量方法都对此进行了评估。在预测N400幅度方面,行为评分比基于语料库的测量方法表现更好,而综合模型表现最佳。未发现存在离散的对/错效应的证据。我们讨论了方法学上的影响,并将结果整合到过去关于N400的研究以及关于可分离词缀动词的神经生理学研究中。