Suppr超能文献

可分离词缀动词组合的一致性由N400进行线性索引。

Congruency of Separable Affix Verb Combinations Is Linearly Indexed by the N400.

作者信息

Hanna Jeff, Pulvermüller Friedemann

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Institute for German and Dutch Philology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 May 28;12:219. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00219. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Separable affix verbs consist of a stem and a derivational affix, which, in some languages can appear together or in discontinuous, distributed form, e.g., German "aufgreifen" and "greifen … auf" ["up-pick(ing)" and "pick … up"]. Certain stems can combine with only certain affixes. However, many such combinations are evaluated not as clearly correct or incorrect, but frequently take an intermediate status with participants rating them ambiguously. Here, we mapped brain responses to combinations of verb stems and affixes realized in short sentences, including more and less common particle verbs, borderline acceptable combinations and clear violations. Event-related potential responses to discontinuous particle verbs were obtained for five affixes re-combined with 10 verb stems, situated within short, German sentences, i.e., "sie en es ," English: "they it ." The congruity of combinations was assessed both with behavioral ratings of the stimuli and corpus-derived probability measures. The size of a frontal N400 correlated with the degree of incongruency between stem and affix, as assessed by both measures. Behavioral ratings performed better than corpus-derived measures in predicting N400 magnitudes, and a combined model performed best of all. No evidence for a discrete, right/wrong effect was found. We discuss methodological implications and integrate the results into past research on the N400 and neurophysiological studies on separable-affix verbs, generally.

摘要

可分离词缀动词由一个词干和一个派生词缀组成,在某些语言中,它们可以一起出现,也可以以不连续的、分散的形式出现,例如,德语中的“aufgreifen”和“greifen … auf”(“向上抓取”和“抓取……向上”)。某些词干只能与某些词缀组合。然而,许多这样的组合并非被明确地判定为正确或错误,而是常常处于一种中间状态,参与者对它们的评价模棱两可。在这里,我们描绘了大脑对短句中动词词干和词缀组合的反应,包括常见程度不同的小品词动词、边缘可接受的组合以及明显的违规情况。针对五个词缀与10个动词词干重新组合形成的不连续小品词动词,在德语短句“sie <词干>en es <词缀>”(英语:“they <词干> it <词缀>”)中获得了事件相关电位反应。通过对刺激的行为评分和基于语料库的概率测量来评估组合的一致性。额叶N400的大小与词干和词缀之间的不一致程度相关,这两种测量方法都对此进行了评估。在预测N400幅度方面,行为评分比基于语料库的测量方法表现更好,而综合模型表现最佳。未发现存在离散的对/错效应的证据。我们讨论了方法学上的影响,并将结果整合到过去关于N400的研究以及关于可分离词缀动词的神经生理学研究中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验