Suppr超能文献

运动疗法对癌症患者心肺功能的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of Exercise Therapy on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Jessica M. Scott, Emily C. Zabor, Scott C. Adams, Chaya S. Moskowitz, Konstantina Matsoukas, Neil M. Iyengar, Chau T. Dang, Lee W. Jones, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Graeme J. Koelwyn, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Chaya S. Moskowitz, Neil M. Iyengar, Chau T. Dang, Lee W. Jones, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Emily Schwitzer, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Tormod S. Nilsen, The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2297-2305. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.5809. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the effects of exercise therapy on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients with adult-onset cancer. Secondary objectives were to evaluate treatment effect modifiers, safety, and fidelity. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify RCTs that compared exercise therapy to a nonexercise control group. The primary end point was change in CRF as evaluated by peak oxygen consumption (VO; in mL O × kg × min) from baseline to postintervention. Subgroup analyses evaluated whether treatment effects differed as a function of exercise prescription (ie, modality, schedule, length, supervision), study characteristics (ie, intervention timing, primary cancer site), and publication year. Safety was defined as report of any adverse event (AE); fidelity was evaluated by rates of attendance, adherence, and loss to follow-up. Results Forty-eight unique RCTs that represented 3,632 patients (mean standard deviation age, 55 ± 7.5 years; 68% women); 1,990 (55%) and 1,642 (45%) allocated to exercise therapy and control/usual care groups, respectively, were evaluated. Exercise therapy was associated with a significant increase in CRF (+2.80 mL O × kg × min) compared with no change (+0.02 mL O × kg × min) in the control group (weighted mean differences, +2.13 mL O × kg × min; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.67; I, 20.6; P < .001). No statistical significant differences were observed on the basis of any treatment effect modifiers. Thirty trials (63%) monitored AEs; a total of 44 AEs were reported. The mean standard deviation loss to follow-up, attendance, and adherence rates were 11% ± 13%, 84% ± 12%, and 88% ± 32%, respectively. Conclusion Exercise therapy is an effective adjunctive therapy to improve CRF in patients with cancer. Our findings support the recommendation of exercise therapy for patients with adult-onset cancer.

摘要

目的

评估运动疗法对成年期癌症患者心肺功能适应性(CRF)的随机对照试验(RCT)的效果。次要目标是评估治疗效果的调节因素、安全性和忠实度。

方法

系统检索 PubMed、Embase、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature 和 Cochrane Library,以确定比较运动疗法与非运动对照组的 RCT。主要终点是根据基线至干预后峰值耗氧量(VO;以毫升 O×kg×min 表示)评估的 CRF 变化。亚组分析评估了治疗效果是否因运动处方(即方式、时间表、长度、监督)、研究特征(即干预时机、主要癌症部位)和出版年份而异。安全性定义为任何不良事件(AE)的报告;忠实度通过出勤率、依从性和随访丢失率来评估。

结果

评估了 48 项独特的 RCT,代表了 3632 名患者(平均年龄标准差为 55±7.5 岁;68%为女性);1990(55%)和 1642(45%)名患者分别分配到运动疗法和对照组/常规护理组。与对照组无变化(+0.02 毫升 O×kg×min)相比,运动疗法与 CRF 显著增加(+2.80 毫升 O×kg×min)相关(加权平均差异,+2.13 毫升 O×kg×min;95%CI,1.58 至 2.67;I,20.6;P<.001)。没有观察到任何治疗效果调节因素的统计学显著差异。30 项试验(63%)监测了 AE;共报告了 44 例 AE。随访丢失、出勤率和依从率的平均值标准差分别为 11%±13%、84%±12%和 88%±32%。

结论

运动疗法是一种有效的辅助疗法,可以提高癌症患者的 CRF。我们的研究结果支持向成年期癌症患者推荐运动疗法。

相似文献

6

引用本文的文献

8
Exercise Testing Characteristics, Safety, and Quality in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review.癌症患者的运动测试特征、安全性及质量:一项系统综述
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jun 11;9(4):100628. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100628. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

2
Exercise Therapy and Cardiovascular Toxicity in Cancer.运动疗法与癌症心血管毒性
Circulation. 2018 Mar 13;137(11):1176-1191. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.024671.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验