Palinkas Lawrence A, Campbell Mark, Saldana Lisa
Department of Children, Youth and Families, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, United States.
Front Public Health. 2018 May 29;6:161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00161. eCollection 2018.
This study examined influences on the decisions of administrators of youth-serving organizations to initiate and proceed with implementation of an evidence-based practice (EBP). Semi-structured interviews, developed using the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) as a framework, were conducted with 19 agency chief executive officers and program directors of 15 organizations serving children and adolescents. Agency leaders' self-assessments of implementation feasibility and desirability prior to implementation (Pre-implementation) were influenced by intervention affordability, feasibility, requirements, validity, reliability, relevance, cost savings, positive outcomes, and adequacy of information; availability of funding, support from sources external to the agency, and adequacy of technical assistance; and staff availability and attitudes toward innovation in general and EBPs in particular, organizational capacity, fit between the EBP and agency mission and capacity, prior experience with implementation, experience with seeking evidence, and developing consensus. Assessments during the Implementation phase included intervention flexibility and requirements; availability of funding, adequacy of training and technical assistance, and getting sufficient and appropriate referrals; and staffing and implementing with fidelity. Assessments during the Sustainment phase included intervention costs and benefits; availability of funding, support from sources outside of the agency, and need for the EBP; and the fit between the EBP and the agency mission. The results point to opportunities for using agency leader models to develop strategies to facilitate implementation of evidence-based and innovative practices for children and adolescents. The SIC provides a standardized framework for guiding agency leader self-assessments of implementation.
本研究考察了对青少年服务组织管理人员做出启动并推进循证实践(EBP)实施决策的影响因素。以实施完成阶段(SIC)为框架开展了半结构化访谈,访谈对象为15个儿童和青少年服务组织的19位机构首席执行官和项目主管。机构领导者在实施前(实施前)对实施可行性和可取性的自我评估受到干预的可承受性、可行性、要求、有效性、可靠性、相关性、成本节约、积极成果和信息充分性;资金可用性、机构外部来源的支持以及技术援助的充分性;以及员工可用性、对一般创新创新创新创新尤其是循证实践的态度、组织能力、循证实践与机构使命和能力的契合度、先前的实施经验、寻求证据的经验以及达成共识的经验等因素的影响。实施阶段的评估包括干预的灵活性和要求;资金可用性、培训和技术援助的充分性以及获得足够且合适的转介;以及人员配备和忠实实施。维持阶段的评估包括干预成本和收益;资金可用性、机构外部来源的支持以及对循证实践的需求;以及循证实践与机构使命的契合度。研究结果指出了利用机构领导者模式制定策略以促进针对儿童和青少年的循证及创新实践实施的机会。实施完成阶段为指导机构领导者对实施情况进行自我评估提供了一个标准化框架。