Suppr超能文献

使用正压和负压冲洗系统联合不同冲洗剂对根尖挤出碎屑的评估。

Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Positive and Negative Pressure Irrigation Systems in Association with Different Irrigants.

作者信息

Barbosa-Ribeiro Marlos, Arruda-Vasconcelos Rodrigo, Fabretti Fabio L, Silva Emmanuel J N L, De-Deus Gustavo, Gomes Brenda P F A

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, State UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Department of Integrated Clinical Procedures, Division of Endodontics, UERJ - Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2018 Mar-Apr;29(2):184-188. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201801750.

Abstract

This study evaluated the amount of apically extruded debris after chemo-mechanical preparation (CMP) using positive and negative pressure irrigation systems [Conventional irrigation (CI) and EndoVac (EV)] in association with different irrigants [6% Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% Chlorhexidine gel + saline solution (CHXg + SS), 2% Chlorhexidine solution (CHXs) or Saline solution (SS)]. Eighty mandibular premolars with single root canals were selected and randomly assigned into 8 groups (n = 10) according to the irrigation system and the irrigant used during CMP: G1 (EV + NaOCl), G2 (EV + CHXg + SS), G3 (EV + CHXs), G4 (EV + SS), G5 (CI + NaOCl), G6 (CI + CHXg + SS), G7 (CI + CHXs) and G8 (CI + SS). Reciproc® R25 files (25/.08) were used during the CMP and the extruded debris from each tooth was collected in pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes and dried. The average weight of debris was assessed using a microbalance, and the data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey's test (a = 0.05). All groups were associated with debris extrusion. EV was the irrigation system with less extruded debris (p < 0.05). No differences were observed regarding the irrigant when EV was used. When CI was used, CHXg + SS were associated with lower debris extrusion (p < 0.05). It was concluded that no irrigation protocol succeeded in preventing debris extrusion. EV resulted in lower levels of debris extrusion than CI. The use of CHXg + SS resulted in lower debris extrusion.

摘要

本研究评估了在化学机械预备(CMP)过程中,使用正压和负压冲洗系统[传统冲洗(CI)和EndoVac(EV)]并联合不同冲洗剂[6%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、2%氯己定凝胶+生理盐水溶液(CHXg + SS)、2%氯己定溶液(CHXs)或生理盐水溶液(SS)]后根尖部挤出碎屑的量。选取80颗单根管下颌前磨牙,根据CMP过程中使用的冲洗系统和冲洗剂将其随机分为8组(n = 10):G1(EV + NaOCl)、G2(EV + CHXg + SS)、G3(EV + CHXs)、G4(EV + SS)、G5(CI + NaOCl)、G6(CI + CHXg + SS)、G7(CI + CHXs)和G8(CI + SS)。CMP过程中使用Reciproc® R25锉(25/.08),将每颗牙齿挤出的碎屑收集到预先称重的Eppendorf管中并干燥。使用微量天平评估碎屑的平均重量,并采用方差分析和事后Tukey检验对数据进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。所有组均有碎屑挤出。EV是挤出碎屑较少的冲洗系统(p < 0.05)。使用EV时,未观察到冲洗剂之间存在差异。使用CI时,CHXg + SS与较低的碎屑挤出相关(p < 0.05)。得出的结论是,没有一种冲洗方案能够成功防止碎屑挤出。与CI相比,EV导致的碎屑挤出水平更低。使用CHXg + SS导致的碎屑挤出更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验