Ozlek Esin, Gündüz Hüseyin, Akkol Elif, Neelakantan Prasanna
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Van Yuzuncu Yil, Van, Turkey.
Discipline of Endodontology, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Mar 24;45(2):e24. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e24. eCollection 2020 May.
It is known that bioactive materials interact with the dentin to undergo biomineralization. The exact role of moisture in this interaction is unknown. Here, we investigate the effects of dentin moisture conditions on the dislocation resistance of two bioactive root canal sealers (MTA Fillapex [Angelus Solucoes Odontologicas] and GuttaFlow BioSeal [Colténe/Whaledent AG]) at 3 weeks and 3 months after obturation.
Mandibular premolars ( = 120) were prepared and randomly divided into 3 groups based on the dentin condition: group 1, dry dentin; group 2, moist dentin; group 3, wet dentin. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for root canal filling: MTA Fillapex and GuttaFlow BioSeal. Dislocation resistance was evaluated by measuring the push-out bond strength at 3 weeks and 3 months. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test with a significance level of 5%.
Moist dentin resulted in higher bond strength values for both materials at both time points. This was significantly higher than wet and dry dentin for both the sealers at the 3 months ( < 0.05), while at 3 weeks it was significant only for GuttaFlow Bioseal. The different moisture conditions demonstrated similar trends in their effects on the dislocation resistance of the 2 root canal sealers.
The dentin moisture conditions had a significant impact on its interaction with the bioactive materials tested. Maintaining moist dentin, but not dry or wet dentin, may be advantageous before the filling root canals with bioactive sealers.
已知生物活性材料与牙本质相互作用以进行生物矿化。水分在这种相互作用中的确切作用尚不清楚。在此,我们研究牙本质湿度条件对两种生物活性根管封闭剂(MTA Fillapex [安吉利斯口腔解决方案公司] 和 GuttaFlow BioSeal [科尔泰恩/惠尔登特股份公司])在充填后3周和3个月时抗脱位性的影响。
制备120颗下颌前磨牙,并根据牙本质状况随机分为3组:第1组,干燥牙本质;第2组,湿润牙本质;第3组,潮湿牙本质。每组再分为2个亚组进行根管充填:MTA Fillapex组和GuttaFlow BioSeal组。通过测量3周和3个月时的推出粘结强度来评估抗脱位性。在体视显微镜下检查失败模式。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。
在两个时间点,湿润牙本质均使两种材料的粘结强度值更高。在3个月时,两种封闭剂在湿润牙本质中的粘结强度均显著高于干燥和潮湿牙本质(P<0.05),而在3周时仅GuttaFlow BioSeal在湿润牙本质中的粘结强度显著更高。不同的湿度条件对两种根管封闭剂抗脱位性的影响呈现相似趋势。
牙本质湿度条件对其与所测试的生物活性材料的相互作用有显著影响。在用生物活性封闭剂充填根管之前,保持牙本质湿润而非干燥或潮湿可能是有利的。