Silveira Camila Maia Maggi, Pimpão Marcelo Voss, Fernandes Leonardo Alexandre, Westphalen Vania Portela Ditzel, Cavenago Bruno Cavalini, Carneiro Everdan
Department of Endodontics, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, Parana Federal University, Brazil.
Eur Endod J. 2019 Nov 19;4(3):122-126. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.57966. eCollection 2019.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of different irrigation solutions on the amount of extruded residues apically, varying the instrumentation technique in manual, continuous rotation, or reciprocation motions. The amounts of residue for each irrigation solution was also assessed.
Two tests were performed. In the first test, 90 mandibular premolars were divided into nine groups (n=10). Each group was subjected to a different technique: ProTaper Universal, WaveOne Gold, or manual instruments, with different irrigation solutions [2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel, or distilled water]. During the preparation of the root canal, the apically extruded material was collected in previously weighed glass vials. In the second test, irrigation solutions were weighed separately with the same weighing method. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way and two-way ANOVA, Levene, Tukey, and Games-Howell tests.
Apically extruded debris was observed in all groups. ProTaper Universal with continuous rotation using 2% CHX gel resulted in the greatest amount of debris (P<0.001). There were significant differences in the amounts of residue among the different groups (P<0.001). Moreover, when the weighing of the irrigation solutions was tested, the 2.5% NaOCl solution produced the greatest amount of residues compared with other irrigation solutions.
Different irrigation solutions influenced the amount of apically extruded debris during the preparation of the canal among the different instrumentation techniques. The ProTaper technique using 2% CHX gel resulted in the greatest amount of apically extruded debris.
本研究的目的是评估不同冲洗液对根尖部挤出残渣量的影响,同时改变手动、连续旋转或往复运动的预备技术。还评估了每种冲洗液的残渣量。
进行了两项试验。在第一项试验中,将90颗下颌前磨牙分为9组(n = 10)。每组采用不同的技术:ProTaper Universal、WaveOne Gold或手动器械,并使用不同的冲洗液[2.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、2%氯己定(CHX)凝胶或蒸馏水]。在根管预备过程中,将根尖部挤出的材料收集在预先称重的玻璃小瓶中。在第二项试验中,采用相同的称重方法分别对冲洗液进行称重。使用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验、单因素和双因素方差分析、Levene检验、Tukey检验和Games-Howell检验对数据进行分析。
所有组均观察到根尖部有挤出的碎屑。使用ProTaper Universal连续旋转并搭配2% CHX凝胶时,挤出的碎屑量最大(P < 0.001)。不同组之间的残渣量存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。此外,在对冲洗液称重测试时,与其他冲洗液相比,2.5% NaOCl溶液产生的残渣量最大。
在不同的预备技术中,不同的冲洗液会影响根管预备过程中根尖部挤出的碎屑量。使用2% CHX凝胶的ProTaper技术导致根尖部挤出的碎屑量最大。