Department of Experimental Medicine, Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Section, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
J Cell Physiol. 2018 Nov;233(11):8996-9006. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26845. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are considered to be an excellent source in regenerative medicine. They contain several cell subtypes, including multipotent stem cells. MSCs are of particular interest as they are currently being tested using cell and gene therapies for a number of human diseases. They represent a rare population in tissues; for this reason, they require, before being transplanted, an in vitro amplification. This process may induce replicative senescence, thus affecting differentiation and proliferative capacities. Increasing evidence suggests that MSCs from fetal tissues are significantly more plastic and grow faster than MSCs from bone marrow. Here, we compare amniotic fluid mesenchymal stromal cells (AF-MSCs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) in terms of cell proliferation, surface markers, multidifferentiation potential, senescence, and DNA repair capacity. Our study shows that AF-MSCs are less prone to senescence with respect to BM-MSCs. Moreover, both cell models activate the same repair system after DNA damage, but AF-MSCs are able to return to the basal condition more efficiently with respect to BM-MSCs. Indeed, AF-MSCs are better able to cope with genotoxic stress that may occur either during in vitro cultivation or following transplantation in patients. Our findings suggest that AF-MSCs may represent a valid alternative to BM-MSCs in regenerative medicine, and, of great relevance, the investigation of the mechanisms involved in DNA repair capacity of both AF-MSCs and BM-MSCs may pave the way to their rational use in the medical field.
间充质基质细胞(MSCs)被认为是再生医学中的优秀来源。它们包含几种细胞亚型,包括多能干细胞。MSCs 特别有趣,因为它们目前正在通过细胞和基因疗法对许多人类疾病进行测试。它们在组织中是罕见的群体;因此,在移植之前,它们需要体外扩增。这个过程可能会引起复制衰老,从而影响分化和增殖能力。越来越多的证据表明,来自胎儿组织的 MSCs 比来自骨髓的 MSCs 具有更高的可塑性和更快的生长速度。在这里,我们比较了羊水间充质基质细胞(AF-MSCs)和骨髓间充质基质细胞(BM-MSCs)在细胞增殖、表面标志物、多向分化潜能、衰老和 DNA 修复能力方面的差异。我们的研究表明,与 BM-MSCs 相比,AF-MSCs 衰老的倾向更小。此外,两种细胞模型在 DNA 损伤后都会激活相同的修复系统,但与 BM-MSCs 相比,AF-MSCs 能够更有效地恢复到基础状态。事实上,AF-MSCs 能够更好地应对体外培养或移植到患者后可能发生的遗传毒性应激。我们的研究结果表明,AF-MSCs 可能是再生医学中 BM-MSCs 的有效替代品,而且,研究 AF-MSCs 和 BM-MSCs 的 DNA 修复能力的机制可能为它们在医学领域的合理应用铺平道路。
Vet Res Commun. 2010-12-31
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013-12-4
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-5-5
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021-7-16