School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH, UK.
School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH, UK.
Exp Eye Res. 2018 Oct;175:98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the Corvis ST (Oculus; Wetzlar, Germany) biomechanical correction algorithm (bIOP) in determining intraocular pressure (IOP) using experiments on ex-vivo human eyes. Five ex-vivo human ocular globes (age 69 ± 3 years) were obtained and tested within 3-5 days post mortem. Using a custom-built inflation rig, the internal pressure of the eyes was controlled mechanically and measured using the CorVis ST (CVS-IOP). The CVS-IOP measurements were then corrected to produce bIOP, which was developed for being less affected by variations in corneal biomechanical parameters, including tissue thickness and material properties. True IOP (IOPt) was defined as the pressure inside of the globe as monitored using a fixed pressure transducer. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the accuracy of both CVS-IOP and bIOP, and their correlation with corneal thickness. While no significant differences were found between bIOP and IOP (0.3 ± 1.6 mmHg, P = 0.989) using ANOVA and Bonferroni Post-Hoc test, the differences between CVS-IOP and IOPt were significant (7.5 ± 3.2 mmHg, P < 0.001). Similarly, bIOP exhibited no significant correlation with central corneal thickness (p = 0.756), whereas CVS-IOP was significantly correlated with the thickness (p < 0.001). The bIOP correction has been successful in providing close estimates of true IOP in ex-vivo tests conducted on human donor eye globes, and in reducing association with the cornea's thickness.
本研究旨在通过对离体人眼球的实验评估 Corvis ST(德国欧科路公司)生物力学修正算法(bIOP)在确定眼内压(IOP)方面的有效性。共获得并测试了 5 个离体人眼球(年龄 69±3 岁),这些眼球在死后 3-5 天内进行测试。使用定制的充气装置,通过机械方式控制眼球内部压力,并使用 Corvis ST(CVS-IOP)进行测量。然后对 CVS-IOP 测量值进行修正以产生 bIOP,bIOP 的开发目的是减少角膜生物力学参数变化(包括组织厚度和材料特性)的影响。使用固定压力传感器监测到的眼球内部压力定义为真实 IOP(IOPt)。进行了统计分析以评估 CVS-IOP 和 bIOP 的准确性及其与角膜厚度的相关性。尽管 ANOVA 和 Bonferroni 事后检验未发现 bIOP 和 IOP 之间存在显著差异(0.3±1.6mmHg,P=0.989),但 CVS-IOP 和 IOPt 之间的差异具有统计学意义(7.5±3.2mmHg,P<0.001)。同样,bIOP 与中央角膜厚度无显著相关性(p=0.756),而 CVS-IOP 与厚度显著相关(p<0.001)。在对人供体眼球进行的离体测试中,bIOP 修正成功地提供了真实 IOP 的接近估计值,并减少了与角膜厚度的关联。