• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌的全机器人手术与全腹腔镜手术对比

Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

作者信息

Esen Eren, Aytac Erman, Ağcaoğlu Orhan, Zenger Serkan, Balik Emre, Baca Bilgi, Hamzaoğlu İsmail, Karahasanoğlu Tayfun, Buğra Dursun

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University.

Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Aug;28(4):245-249. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000552.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000552
PMID:29912779
Abstract

In this study, perioperative and short-term postoperative results of totally robotic versus totally laparoscopic rectal resections for cancer were investigated in a comparative manner by considering risk factors including obesity, male sex, and neoadjuvant treatment. In addition to overall comparison, the impact of sex, obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m), and neoadjuvant treatment was assessed in patients who had a total mesorectal excision (TME). Operative time was longer in the robotic group (P<0.001). In obese patients who underwent TME, the mean length of hospital stay was shorter (7±2 vs. 9±4 d, P=0.01), and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher (30±19 vs. 23±10, P=0.02) in the robotic group. Totally robotic and totally laparoscopic surgery appears to be providing similar outcomes in patients undergoing rectal resections for cancer. Selective use of a robot may have a role for improving postoperative outcomes in some challenging cases including obese patients undergoing TME.

摘要

在本研究中,通过考虑肥胖、男性性别和新辅助治疗等风险因素,以对比的方式研究了全机器人手术与全腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的围手术期及术后短期结果。除了总体比较外,还评估了性别、肥胖(体重指数≥30 kg/m²)和新辅助治疗对接受全直肠系膜切除术(TME)患者的影响。机器人手术组的手术时间更长(P<0.001)。在接受TME的肥胖患者中,机器人手术组的平均住院时间更短(7±2天 vs. 9±4天,P=0.01),平均获取淋巴结数量更多(30±19个 vs. 23±10个,P=0.02)。全机器人手术和全腹腔镜手术在接受直肠癌切除术的患者中似乎提供了相似的结果。在一些具有挑战性的病例中,包括接受TME的肥胖患者,选择性使用机器人可能对改善术后结果具有作用。

相似文献

1
Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌的全机器人手术与全腹腔镜手术对比
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Aug;28(4):245-249. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000552.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.新辅助放化疗后男性中低位直肠癌患者机器人与腹腔镜保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术:长期结果比较
J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):393-399. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01001-5. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.肥胖患者的机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜直肠癌手术
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Nov;18(11):1063-1071. doi: 10.1111/codi.13374.
4
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
5
Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?机器人能否克服肥胖相关的直肠癌微创手术局限性?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):e8-e11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000500.
6
Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.腹腔镜直肠手术经验可减少机器人直肠切除术的学习曲线:累积和分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4067-4076. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5453-9. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除质量与环周切缘深度:前20例机器人手术病例的配对比较
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):603-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12634.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术用于保留肛门手术:单中心 130 例连续患者的病理和短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4085-4091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
9
Endowrist versus wrist: a case-controlled study comparing robotic versus hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.腕关节内置式机器人与传统手腕操作:一项病例对照研究,比较机器人辅助与手辅助腹腔镜直肠癌手术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Oct;24(5):452-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318290158d.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术:倾向病例匹配分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Feb;15(1):e1965. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1965. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高危患者结直肠癌的机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Apr 8;29(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03141-3.
2
The perioperative results of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者直肠癌机器人手术与腹腔镜手术的围手术期结果:系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03781-7.
3
Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between high and low tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in robotic rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.
机器人直肠癌手术中肠系膜下动脉高位与低位结扎的短期手术结局比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 4;19(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02209-w.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing the efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients.一项系统评价和荟萃分析比较了肥胖患者机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术短期疗效的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 9;18(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01934-6.
5
The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助手术在直肠癌治疗中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6282-6296. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001380.
6
The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人内脏手术在粘连患者中的作用:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 18;12(2):307. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020307.
7
Robotic-Assisted vs. Standard Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 19,731 Patients.机器人辅助与标准腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌切除术:对19731例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;14(1):180. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010180.
8
Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, case-matched studies, and cohort studies.研究设计对直肠癌手术结果的影响差异:随机临床试验、病例匹配研究和队列研究的荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa067.
9
An advanced RFID-based system to localize gastric and colon cancers during laparoscopic surgery.一种基于先进的 RFID 技术的系统,用于在腹腔镜手术中定位胃癌和结肠癌。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):139-147. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07371-4. Epub 2020 Jan 13.