• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用嵌体或高嵌体修复的前磨牙的应力分布:三维有限元分析

Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis.

作者信息

Yang Hongso, Park Chan, Shin Jin-Ho, Yun Kwi-Dug, Lim Hyun-Pil, Park Sang-Won, Chung Hyunju

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;10(3):184-190. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.184. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.184
PMID:29930787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6004358/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays using various materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional maxillary premolar models of abutments were designed to include the following: 1) inlay with O cavity (O group), 2) inlay with MO cavity (MO group), 3) inlay with MOD cavity (MOD group), and 4) onlay (ONLAY group). A restoration of each inlay or onlay cavity was simulated using gold alloy, e.max ceramic, or composite resin for restoration. To simulate masticatory forces, a total of 140 N static axial force was applied onto the tooth at the occlusal contact areas. A finite element analysis was performed to predict the magnitude and pattern of stresses generated by occlusal loading.

RESULTS

Maximum von Mises stress values generated in the abutment teeth of the ONLAY group were ranged from 26.1 to 26.8 MPa, which were significantly lower than those of inlay groups (O group: 260.3-260.7 MPa; MO group: 252.1-262.4 MPa; MOD group: 281.4-298.8 MPa). Maximum von Mises stresses generated with ceramic, gold, and composite restorations were 280.1, 269.9, and 286.6 MPa, respectively, in the MOD group. They were 252.2, 248.0, 255.1 MPa, respectively, in the ONLAY group.

CONCLUSION

The onlay design (ONLAY group) protected tooth structures more effectively than inlay designs (O, MO, and MOD groups). However, stress magnitudes in restorations with various dental materials exhibited no significant difference among groups (O, MO, MOD, ONLAY).

摘要

目的

分析使用不同材料制作嵌体或高嵌体修复的前磨牙的应力分布情况。

材料与方法

设计上颌前磨牙基牙的三维模型,包括以下几种:1)O洞型嵌体(O组),2)MO洞型嵌体(MO组),3)MOD洞型嵌体(MOD组),4)高嵌体(高嵌体组)。分别使用金合金、e.max陶瓷或复合树脂模拟修复每种嵌体或高嵌体洞型。为模拟咀嚼力,在牙合接触区域对牙齿施加总共140 N的静态轴向力。进行有限元分析以预测牙合加载产生的应力大小和模式。

结果

高嵌体组基牙产生的最大冯·米塞斯应力值范围为26.1至26.8 MPa,显著低于嵌体组(O组:260.3 - 260.7 MPa;MO组:252.1 - 262.4 MPa;MOD组:281.4 - 298.8 MPa)。在MOD组中,陶瓷、金和复合树脂修复体产生的最大冯·米塞斯应力分别为280.1、269.9和286.6 MPa。在高嵌体组中,它们分别为252.2、248.0、255.1 MPa。

结论

高嵌体设计(高嵌体组)比嵌体设计(O、MO和MOD组)更有效地保护牙体结构。然而,不同牙科材料修复体中的应力大小在各实验组(O、MO、MOD、高嵌体)之间无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/3b7579e0f5ed/jap-10-184-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/4b1c8c757cb8/jap-10-184-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/fd81e7b2a97c/jap-10-184-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/8477e4d61bed/jap-10-184-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/53916ee46950/jap-10-184-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/3851a74bd4c5/jap-10-184-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/25a98e40fc10/jap-10-184-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/afcc97e94979/jap-10-184-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/c70cf3abac33/jap-10-184-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/3b7579e0f5ed/jap-10-184-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/4b1c8c757cb8/jap-10-184-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/fd81e7b2a97c/jap-10-184-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/8477e4d61bed/jap-10-184-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/53916ee46950/jap-10-184-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/3851a74bd4c5/jap-10-184-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/25a98e40fc10/jap-10-184-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/afcc97e94979/jap-10-184-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/c70cf3abac33/jap-10-184-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4a/6004358/3b7579e0f5ed/jap-10-184-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis.用嵌体或高嵌体修复的前磨牙的应力分布:三维有限元分析
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;10(3):184-190. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.184. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.嵌体或高嵌体修复磨牙的应力分布:三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7.
3
A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.不同材料嵌体、高嵌体和全冠的微体积应力比较及其在磨牙咀嚼计算机模拟中的粘结 - 有限元分析。
Dent Mater. 2020 Jul;36(7):854-864. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.用全瓷修复体修复的根管治疗前磨牙的应变测量和抗折性
J Dent. 2015 Jan;43(1):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
5
Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.粘结陶瓷和树脂复合材料Ⅱ类嵌体修复体中的应力分布:一项三维有限元分析研究
Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):862-72. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.001.
6
Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.用黏结型新型牙本质复合树脂和全瓷嵌体/高嵌体修复的预备前磨牙的抗折性能:实验室研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 May;30(3):229-239. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12364. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
7
A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.嵌体修复与直接修复的磨牙应力比较,包括复合树脂的聚合收缩和咀嚼过程中的牙齿负荷。
Dent Mater. 2015 Mar;31(3):e77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
8
Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.基于蔡-吴失效准则的磨牙不同设计陶瓷嵌体和高嵌体的强度评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Aug;98(2):89-100. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60042-0.
9
Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study.间接修复体设计对抗折性的影响:一项有限元研究。
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Jan 8;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0115-4.
10
Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location.前磨牙牙尖弯曲度与修复材料及咬合接触位置的关系
Quintessence Int. 2009 May;40(5):363-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different cavity designs and CAD/CAM blocks on fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with MOD cavities.不同洞型设计及计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)嵌体对有近中-牙合-远中(MOD)洞型的上颌前磨牙抗折性能的影响
Odontology. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01079-4.
2
Comparison of the biomechanical effects of the post-core crown, endocrown and inlay crown after deep margin elevation and its clinical significance.深边缘提升后桩核冠、内冠和嵌体冠的生物力学效果比较及其临床意义。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04604-z.
3
Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Applications of Transverse Post for the Rehabilitation of Endodontically Treated Teeth.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant.平台转换种植体的三维有限元分析
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;9(1):31-37. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.1.31. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
2
A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis.萎缩性上颌后牙区两颗短种植体支持的磨牙修复:有限元分析
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Aug;8(4):304-12. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.304. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
The influence of elastic modulus of inlay materials on stress distribution and fracture of premolars.
用于根管治疗后牙齿修复的横向桩的有限元分析及临床应用
Cureus. 2024 Jul 3;16(7):e63719. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63719. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Adhesive-Ceramic Interface Behavior in Dental Restorations. FEM Study and SEM Investigation.牙科修复体中粘结剂-陶瓷界面行为。有限元研究与扫描电子显微镜调查。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;14(17):5048. doi: 10.3390/ma14175048.
5
Fatigue behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with MOD defects under different minimally invasive restorations.不同微创修复方式下颌前磨牙 MOD 缺损根管治疗后牙疲劳行为。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03991-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Investigating inlay designs of class II cavity with deep margin elevation using finite element method.采用有限元法研究 II 类洞深边缘抬高的嵌体设计。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 16;21(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01630-z.
7
Biomechanical stress and microgap analysis of bone-level and tissue-level implant abutment structure according to the five different directions of occlusal loads.根据五种不同方向的咬合负荷对骨水平和组织水平种植体基台结构进行生物力学应力和微间隙分析。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;12(5):316-321. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.316. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
8
Four-Year Follow-up of Increased Vertical Dimension of Occlusion using Resin Composites.使用树脂复合材料增加咬合垂直距离的四年随访
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;8(5):469-474. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_233_18. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
嵌体材料弹性模量对前磨牙应力分布及骨折的影响。
Oper Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):E160-70. doi: 10.2341/13-092-L.
4
Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.洞型设计预备对上颌前磨牙应力值的影响:有限元分析
Croat Med J. 2012 Dec;53(6):568-76. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.568.
5
Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs.三种种植体-基台界面设计的非线性有限元分析。
Int J Oral Sci. 2012 Jun;4(2):101-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2012.35.
6
Experimental and FE shear-bonding strength at core/veneer interfaces in bilayered ceramics.双层陶瓷中芯/面层界面的实验和有限元剪切结合强度。
Dent Mater. 2011 Jun;27(6):590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
7
Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth.间接复合树脂修复后牙的三维有限元数值疲劳模型。
Dent Mater. 2011 May;27(5):423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents.嵌体和高嵌体修复的前磨牙的抗折性能及两种不同黏结剂的黏结效果。
J Prosthodont Res. 2011 Jan;55(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
9
The all-ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 1. Ceramic inlay preparation design: a literature review.全瓷嵌体支持式固定局部义齿。第 1 部分。嵌体修复设计:文献回顾。
Aust Dent J. 2010 Jun;55(2):120-7; quiz 231. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01214.x.
10
Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.嵌体或高嵌体修复磨牙的应力分布:三维有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jan;103(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7.