• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持胃癌的D2淋巴结清扫术

Favoring D-Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer.

作者信息

Karavokyros Ioannis, Michalinos Adamantios

机构信息

First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2018 Jun 7;5:42. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00042. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2018.00042
PMID:29930941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6001702/
Abstract

The role of extended lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer has been debated for many years. So far six prospective randomized trials and a number of meta-analyses comparing D- to D-lymphadenectomy in open surgery have been published with contradicting results. The possible oncologic benefit of radical lymphadenectomy has been blurred by a number of reasons. In most of the trials the strategies under comparison were made similar after protocol violations. Imperfect design of the trials could not exclude the influence of cofounding factors. Inappropriate endpoints could not detect evidently the difference between the two surgical strategies. On the other hand radical lymphadenectomy was characterized by increased morbidity and mortality. This was mostly caused by the addition of pancreatico-splenectomy in all D-dissections, even when not indicated. A careful analysis of the available evidence indicates that D-lymphadenectomy performed by adequately trained surgeons without resection of the pancreas and/or spleen, unless otherwise indicated, decreases Gastric Cancer Related Deaths and increases Disease Specific Survival. This evidence is not compelling but cannot be ignored. D-lymphadendctomy is nowadays considered to be the standard of care for resectable gastric cancer.

摘要

扩大淋巴结清扫术在胃癌外科治疗中的作用多年来一直存在争议。到目前为止,已经发表了六项前瞻性随机试验以及一些比较开放手术中D级与D级淋巴结清扫术的荟萃分析,但结果相互矛盾。根治性淋巴结清扫术可能带来的肿瘤学益处因多种原因而变得模糊不清。在大多数试验中,在违反方案后,所比较的策略变得相似。试验设计不完善无法排除混杂因素的影响。不恰当的终点无法明显检测出两种手术策略之间的差异。另一方面,根治性淋巴结清扫术的特点是发病率和死亡率增加。这主要是由于在所有D级清扫术中都增加了胰脾切除术,即使并无必要。对现有证据的仔细分析表明,由训练有素的外科医生进行D级淋巴结清扫术,在无其他指征的情况下不切除胰腺和/或脾脏,可降低胃癌相关死亡率并提高疾病特异性生存率。这一证据虽不具有说服力,但也不能被忽视。如今,D级淋巴结清扫术被认为是可切除胃癌的标准治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Favoring D-Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer.支持胃癌的D2淋巴结清扫术
Front Surg. 2018 Jun 7;5:42. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00042. eCollection 2018.
2
Resection for gastric cancer in the community.社区胃癌切除术
Semin Oncol. 2005 Dec;32(6 Suppl 9):S90-3. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.010.
3
In Patients with Localized and Resectable Gastric Cancer, What is the Optimal Extent of Lymph Node Dissection-D1 Versus D2 Versus D3?在局部可切除胃癌患者中,淋巴结清扫 D1、D2 与 D3 的最佳范围是什么?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2912-2932. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07417-5. Epub 2019 May 10.
4
[Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: can the type of lymphadenectomy condition the long-term results?].[胃癌全胃切除术:淋巴结清扫类型会影响长期疗效吗?]
Suppl Tumori. 2005 May-Jun;4(3):S84-5.
5
Lymph node dissection in resectable advanced gastric cancer.可切除的进展期胃癌的淋巴结清扫。
Dig Surg. 2013;30(2):96-103. doi: 10.1159/000350873. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
6
Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision, D2 + CME) with conventional D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(D2淋巴结清扫术加完整胃系膜切除术,D2+CME)与传统D2淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃腺癌的前瞻性随机对照试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 9;19(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2790-5.
7
A comparison of the operative outcomes of D1 and D2 gastrectomy performed at a single Western center with multiple surgeons: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.单一西方中心多位外科医生行 D1 与 D2 胃切除术的手术结局比较:倾向评分匹配的回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1422-6.
8
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.胃癌D1和D2切除术后的术后发病率和死亡率:MRC随机对照外科试验的初步结果。外科协作组
Lancet. 1996 Apr 13;347(9007):995-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90144-0.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of extended lymphadenectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer.系统评价和荟萃分析可切除胃癌患者扩大淋巴结清扫术的有效性和安全性。
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):595-604. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9497. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection.胃癌:淋巴结清扫的现状
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):2875-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2875.

引用本文的文献

1
Current management of gastric adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.胃腺癌的当前管理:一项叙述性综述。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Aug 31;14(4):1933-1948. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-818. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.揭示淋巴结清扫术对晚期胃癌的影响:一项综合综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;13(8):1769. doi: 10.3390/life13081769.
3
Efficacy of Lymph Node Location-Number Hybrid Staging System on the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients.淋巴结位置-数量混合分期系统对胃癌患者预后的疗效
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 8;15(9):2659. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092659.
4
Preclinical evaluation of sentinel node localization in the stomach via mannose-labelled magnetic nanoparticles and indocyanine green.经甘露糖标记的磁性纳米颗粒和吲哚菁绿对胃前哨淋巴结定位的临床前评估。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6185-6196. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10099-6. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Comparison of S-1-based vs. capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.S-1 与卡培他滨辅助化疗治疗胃癌患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;77(12):1791-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03187-w. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
6
Pancreatic Fistula after D1+/D2 Radical Gastrectomy according to the Updated International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Criteria: Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences. Experience of Surgeons with High Caseloads in a Single Surgical Center in Eastern Europe.根据更新后的国际胰腺手术研究组标准,D1+/D2根治性胃切除术后的胰瘘:危险因素与临床后果。东欧单一外科中心高病例量外科医生的经验。
J Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(1):16-29. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e3. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
A study of outcomes, technical safety, and feasibility of D-2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术的疗效、技术安全性及可行性研究
JGH Open. 2020 Aug 8;4(6):1114-1118. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12402. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
Prognosis of Adjuvant SOX vs XELOX Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer After D2 Gastrectomy in Chinese Patients.中国患者D2胃切除术后辅助性SOX与XELOX化疗方案治疗胃癌的预后
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Oct 13;12:10091-10101. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S270387. eCollection 2020.
9
The role of bursectomy in the surgical management of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.胆囊切除术在胃癌外科治疗中的作用:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):939-950. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00801-x. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
10
Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.基于解剖部位的淋巴结分期系统优于第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会分期系统,适用于接受手术切除、组织学低级别胃癌的患者:单机构经验。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211836. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.胃癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v38-v49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw350.
2
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).《日本胃癌治疗指南2014(第4版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
3
The Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) guidelines for gastric cancer staging and treatment: 2015.意大利胃癌研究小组(GIRCG)胃癌分期与治疗指南:2015年版
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):20-30. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0615-3. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
4
Seom guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer 2015.2015年胃癌治疗的某些指南。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2015 Dec;17(12):996-1004. doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1456-y. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Quality control of lymph node dissection in the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trial.荷兰胃癌试验中淋巴结清扫的质量控制。
Br J Surg. 2015 Oct;102(11):1388-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9891. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach.胃癌腺癌的淋巴结清扫范围。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD001964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001964.pub4.
7
Lymphadenectomy extent and survival of patients with gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event data from randomized trials.胃腺癌患者淋巴结清扫范围与生存:来自随机试验时间事件数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 May;41(5):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
Learning curve for gastric cancer surgery based on actual survival.基于实际生存率的胃癌手术学习曲线
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Apr;19(2):631-638. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0477-0. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
9
Personalized Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 Lymphadenectomy.胃癌的个体化手术:D1与D2淋巴结清扫术的Meta分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(6):1820-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4168-6. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
10
International comparison of the German evidence-based S3-guidelines on the diagnosis and multimodal treatment of early and locally advanced gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus.德国基于证据的S3指南对早期和局部晚期胃癌(包括食管下段腺癌)的诊断和多模式治疗的国际比较。
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):550-63. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0403-x. Epub 2014 Sep 7.