• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异丙酚镇静在门诊结肠镜检查期间和之后的安全性和有效性。

Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpatient colonoscopy.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, Komagane 399-4117, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 14;18(26):3420-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3420.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3420
PMID:22807612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3396195/
Abstract

AIM

To study the safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation for outpatient colonoscopy.

METHODS

Propofol was given by bolus injection with an age-adjusted standard protocol consisting of 60 mg for patients < 70 years old, 40 mg for patients age 70-89 years, and 20 mg for those ≥ 90 years, and additional injections of 20 mg propofol were given up to a maximum of 200 mg. The principal parameters were the occurrence of adverse events within 24 h after colonoscopy and overall satisfaction for this procedure. Secondary parameters included successful procedure, respiratory depression, and other complications.

RESULTS

Consecutive patients were entered prospectively and all 2101 entered successfully completed outpatient colonoscopy. The mean dose of propofol used was 96.4 mg (range 40-200 mg). Younger patients required higher doses of propofol than older patients (20-40 years vs ≥ 61 years: 115.3 ± 32 mg vs 89.7 ± 21 mg, P < 0.001). Transient supplemental oxygen supply was needed by five patients (0.2%); no other complications occurred. The questionnaires were completed by 1820 (87%) of 2101 patients and most rated their overall satisfaction as excellent (80%) or good (17%). The majority (65%) of patients drove home or to their office after their colonoscopy. Most (99%) were willing to repeat the same procedure. No incidents occurred within 24 h after colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Propofol sedation using a dose < 200 mg proved both safe and practical for outpatient colonoscopy.

摘要

目的

研究丙泊酚镇静用于门诊结肠镜检查的安全性和有效性。

方法

采用年龄调整标准方案给予丙泊酚推注,< 70 岁患者给予 60 mg,70-89 岁患者给予 40 mg,≥ 90 岁患者给予 20 mg,最大剂量不超过 200 mg。主要参数为结肠镜检查后 24 小时内不良事件的发生情况和对该程序的总体满意度。次要参数包括手术成功、呼吸抑制和其他并发症。

结果

连续患者前瞻性纳入,2101 例全部成功完成门诊结肠镜检查。丙泊酚的平均用量为 96.4 mg(范围 40-200 mg)。年轻患者比老年患者需要更高剂量的丙泊酚(20-40 岁 vs ≥ 61 岁:115.3 ± 32 mg vs 89.7 ± 21 mg,P < 0.001)。5 例患者(0.2%)需要短暂补充氧气。未发生其他并发症。2101 例患者中有 1820 例(87%)完成了问卷调查,大多数患者总体满意度评为优秀(80%)或良好(17%)。大多数(65%)患者在结肠镜检查后开车回家或回办公室。大多数(99%)患者愿意重复相同的程序。结肠镜检查后 24 小时内未发生任何事件。

结论

< 200 mg 的剂量下,使用丙泊酚镇静用于门诊结肠镜检查既安全又实用。

相似文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpatient colonoscopy.异丙酚镇静在门诊结肠镜检查期间和之后的安全性和有效性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 14;18(26):3420-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3420.
2
Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults.低剂量丙泊酚镇静用于诊断性食管胃十二指肠镜检查:10662例成年人的结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1650-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.250. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
3
Safety and Effectiveness of Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation in Outpatients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.护士管理下的异丙酚镇静在门诊胃肠道内镜检查中的安全性和有效性。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1098-1104.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.025. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
The safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: prospective study.结肠镜检查患者自控镇静的安全性、可行性及可接受性:前瞻性研究
Hong Kong Med J. 2004 Apr;10(2):84-8.
5
Safety of nurse-administered propofol sedation using PCA pump for outpatient colonoscopy in Chinese patients: a pilot study.中国患者门诊结肠镜检查中使用PCA泵由护士给予丙泊酚镇静的安全性:一项试点研究。
Asian J Surg. 2007 Oct;30(4):239-43. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(08)60032-9.
6
Patient-controlled sedation versus intravenous sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.老年患者结肠镜检查中患者自控镇静与静脉镇静的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Nov;56(5):629-32. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.128919.
7
Propofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.门诊结肠镜检查中丙泊酚与非丙泊酚镇静——使用基于脑电图的SEDLine监测仪对镇静深度进行前瞻性比较
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9769-5. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
8
Propofol sedation in patients undergoing colonoscopy in Jamaica.
West Indian Med J. 2011 Jun;60(3):284-8.
9
Nurse-administered propofol-alfentanil sedation using a patient-controlled analgesia pump compared with opioid-benzodiazepine sedation for outpatient colonoscopy.使用患者自控镇痛泵由护士给予丙泊酚-阿芬太尼镇静与使用阿片类药物-苯二氮䓬类药物镇静用于门诊结肠镜检查的比较。
Endoscopy. 2009 Jun;41(6):522-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214711. Epub 2009 May 13.
10
A prospective safety study of a low-dose propofol sedation protocol for colonoscopy.一项关于结肠镜检查低剂量丙泊酚镇静方案的前瞻性安全性研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;5(5):563-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.01.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of different doses of esketamine on the incidence of hypotension in propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.不同剂量艾司氯胺酮对结肠镜检查丙泊酚镇静中低血压发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Sep 18;15:20420986241278499. doi: 10.1177/20420986241278499. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of propofol-based sedation and midazolam sedation in pediatric bidirectional endoscopy conducted by pediatric gastroenterologists.儿科胃肠病学家进行的小儿双向内镜检查中丙泊酚镇静与咪达唑仑镇静的比较。
DEN Open. 2024 Jun 14;5(1):e391. doi: 10.1002/deo2.391. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen reduced hypoxemia in patients undergoing gastroscopy under general anesthesia at ultra-high altitude: a randomized controlled trial.高流量鼻导管吸氧降低超高海拔全身麻醉下胃镜检查患者的低氧血症:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 May 27;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02568-9.
4
Evaluation of Propofol-Sparing Effect of Intravenous Lignocaine in Patients Undergoing Daycare Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures.日间上消化道内镜检查患者静脉注射利多卡因对丙泊酚的节约效应评估。
Cureus. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e32090. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32090. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscopic Sedation.2021 韩国胃肠内镜学会内镜镇静临床实践指南。
Gut Liver. 2022 May 15;16(3):341-356. doi: 10.5009/gnl210530.
6
2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscopic Sedation.2021年韩国胃肠内镜学会内镜镇静临床实践指南
Clin Endosc. 2022 Mar;55(2):167-182. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.282. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Bispectral Index Monitoring and Observer Rating Scale Correlate with Dreaming during Propofol Anesthesia for Gastrointestinal Endoscopies.双谱指数监测与观察者评分量表与胃肠内镜检查丙泊酚麻醉期间的做梦情况相关。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 31;58(1):62. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010062.
8
Clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen in patients undergoing ERCP under sedation.高流量鼻氧在镇静下接受 ERCP 患者中的临床疗效。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79798-7.
9
Safety and Recipient Satisfaction of Propofol Sedation in Outpatient Endoscopy: A 24-Hour Prospective Investigation Using a Questionnaire Survey.门诊内镜检查中丙泊酚镇静的安全性及受检者满意度:一项采用问卷调查的24小时前瞻性调查
Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):340-347. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.138. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
10
The propofol-sparing effect of intravenous lidocaine in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.静脉注射利多卡因对老年结肠镜检查患者的异丙酚节省作用:一项随机、双盲、对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 30;20(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01049-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy replacement using esophagogastroduodenoscopy and propofol sedation.使用食管胃十二指肠镜检查和丙泊酚镇静进行门诊经皮内镜下胃造口术置换的有效性。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb 16;4(2):45-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i2.45.
2
Unsedated colonoscopy: an option for some but not for all.非镇静结肠镜检查:对某些人是一种选择,但不是所有人都适用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.015.
3
Psychomotor recovery and blood propofol level in colonoscopy when using propofol sedation.结肠镜检查时使用异丙酚镇静的精神运动恢复和血异丙酚水平。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
4
Balanced propofol sedation administered by nonanesthesiologists: The first Italian experience.非麻醉医师实施平衡丙泊酚镇静:意大利的首次经验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep 7;17(33):3818-23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3818.
5
Is there a place for sedationless colonoscopy?无镇静结肠镜检查是否可行?
J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;1(1):19-22. doi: 10.4161/jig.1.1.14592.
6
Sedation-risk-free colonoscopy for minimizing the burden of colorectal cancer screening.无镇静风险的结肠镜检查以减轻结直肠癌筛查负担
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar 16;2(3):81-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i3.81.
7
Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.结肠镜检查的质量指标与间隔期癌症风险。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
8
CO(2) insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists.CO2 注入在可能困难的结肠镜检查中的应用:经验较少的结肠镜医师使用时的疗效。
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 7;15(41):5186-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5186.
9
Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience.内镜医师指导下丙泊酚的给药:全球安全性经验
Gastroenterology. 2009 Oct;137(4):1229-37; quiz 1518-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.042. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
10
Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults.低剂量丙泊酚镇静用于诊断性食管胃十二指肠镜检查:10662例成年人的结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1650-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.250. Epub 2009 Jun 9.