• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在剖宫产时成功完成输卵管切除术(全部或部分)。

Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.

机构信息

University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817.

University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817.

出版信息

Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):232-236. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.003
PMID:29935148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6129193/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate completion of partial or total salpingectomy during Cesarean delivery based on intended procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study of women who had a permanent contraception procedure during Cesarean delivery at an urban, academic hospital from November 2015 through April 2017. We reviewed all charts of women who had a Cesarean delivery to identify those who underwent concomitant tubal surgery, including both completed and attempted procedures. We compared demographic, medical, and obstetric characteristics of participants by planned and completed method using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 122 women who underwent Cesarean delivery with planned concurrent permanent contraception procedure. Thirty-two (26.2%) women preferred partial salpingectomy and 90 (73.8%) preferred total salpingectomy. All women who desired partial salpingectomy had the procedure performed. However, 17 (18.9%) women desiring total salpingectomy could not have the procedure performed bilaterally: nine underwent a mixed procedure and seven underwent bilateral partial salpingectomy because of adhesions, engorged vasculature, or unspecified reasons. One woman had significant adhesive disease preventing any procedure. Among women who planned a total salpingectomy, having ≥3 Cesarean deliveries was the only factor associated with needing an alternative procedure (P=.04).

CONCLUSION

As interest in total salpingectomy for permanent contraception increases, surgeons should counsel women who are interested in total salpingectomy at time of Cesarean delivery that adhesions and tubal proximity to adjacent vessels may preclude completion of bilateral tubal removal and discuss alternative options prior to surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

Interest in bilateral total salpingectomy for permanent contraception at the time of Cesarean delivery is increasing; accordingly, surgeons should counsel patients that adhesions and proximity to large vessels may preclude completion of bilateral total salpingectomy, especially in women who have had multiple prior Cesarean deliveries.

摘要

目的

根据手术计划评估剖宫产术中部分或全部输卵管切除术的完成情况。

研究设计

我们对 2015 年 11 月至 2017 年 4 月在一家城市学术医院行剖宫产术时同时进行永久性避孕手术的妇女进行了回顾性研究。我们回顾了所有行剖宫产术的妇女的病历,以确定那些同时行输卵管手术的妇女,包括已完成和未完成的手术。我们使用单变量分析比较了计划和完成方法的参与者的人口统计学、医学和产科特征。

结果

我们确定了 122 名行剖宫产术且计划同期行永久性避孕手术的妇女。32 名(26.2%)妇女首选部分输卵管切除术,90 名(73.8%)妇女首选双侧输卵管切除术。所有希望行部分输卵管切除术的妇女均进行了该手术。然而,17 名(18.9%)希望行双侧输卵管切除术的妇女不能同时进行双侧手术:9 名妇女行混合手术,7 名妇女因粘连、血管充盈或不明原因而行双侧部分输卵管切除术。1 名妇女因严重粘连性疾病而无法进行任何手术。在计划行双侧输卵管切除术的妇女中,行剖宫产术≥3 次是唯一与需要替代手术相关的因素(P=.04)。

结论

随着对行剖宫产术时行双侧输卵管切除术作为永久性避孕方法的兴趣增加,外科医生应在行剖宫产术时向有兴趣行双侧输卵管切除术的妇女提供咨询,告知其粘连和输卵管与邻近血管的接近程度可能会妨碍双侧输卵管切除的完成,并在手术前讨论替代方案。

意义

在剖宫产时行双侧输卵管切除术作为永久性避孕的兴趣正在增加;因此,外科医生应告知患者,粘连和邻近大血管的位置可能会妨碍双侧输卵管切除术的完成,尤其是在那些已经多次行剖宫产术的患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/956d/6129193/771bc3753490/nihms976651f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/956d/6129193/771bc3753490/nihms976651f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/956d/6129193/771bc3753490/nihms976651f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.在剖宫产时成功完成输卵管切除术(全部或部分)。
Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):232-236. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
2
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.剖宫产时行随机输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):106.e1-106.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
3
Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.剖宫产时行输卵管切除术与标准产后输卵管结扎术的可行性比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):20-27. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002646.
4
Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.择期和非计划性剖宫产时在产后避孕措施中施行机会性输卵管切除术。
Contraception. 2019 Jun;99(6):373-376. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
5
Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.剖宫产时行输卵管切除术与结扎术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002674.
6
Frequency and characteristics associated with opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery: A retrospective chart review.剖宫产术中行输卵管切除术的机会性及其特征:一项回顾性图表审查。
Contraception. 2021 Mar;103(3):203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.剖宫产术中行输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术用于永久性避孕:结局和医生态度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):860-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Permanent Sterilization after Failed Attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section.经剖宫产术时双侧输卵管结扎失败后行阴道自然腔道内镜手术绝育的效用。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Oct;29(10):1138-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中全双侧输卵管切除术与部分双侧输卵管切除术用于永久性绝育的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1185-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4340-x. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
10
Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.美国剖宫产术中从输卵管结扎到偶然输卵管切除术的范式转变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):399.e1-399.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.074. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Histopathologic and Preneoplastic Changes in Tubal Ligation Materials.输卵管结扎材料的组织病理学和癌前变化。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 4;59(12):2117. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122117.
2
Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial.女性对长效避孕方法的偏好和对假设性试验的随机分组意愿。
Contraception. 2019 Jan;99(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Risks and Benefits of Salpingectomy at the Time of Sterilization.绝育时行输卵管切除术的风险与获益。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017 Nov;72(11):663-668. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000503.
2
Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.绝育输卵管切除术:2011 - 2016年大型综合医疗保健系统中的实践变化
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):961-967. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002312.
3
The Evolution of and Evidence for Opportunistic Salpingectomy.机会性输卵管切除术的演变与证据
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):814-824. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002243.
4
Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.2008 - 2013年美国住院产后长效可逆避孕与绝育情况
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001970.
5
Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial.剖宫产同时行输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术后的卵巢储备功能:一项随机试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):472.e1-472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中全双侧输卵管切除术与部分双侧输卵管切除术用于永久性绝育的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1185-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4340-x. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
7
Technique for bilateral salpingectomy at the time of Cesarean delivery: a case series.剖宫产时双侧输卵管切除术技术:病例系列
Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):509-511. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
Physicians' Perspectives and Practice Patterns Toward Opportunistic Salpingectomy in High- and Low-Risk Women.医生对高风险和低风险女性进行机会性输卵管切除术的观点和实践模式。
Cancer Invest. 2017 Jan 2;35(1):51-61. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2016.1242597. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国预防性双侧输卵管切除术治疗卵巢癌的效果和安全性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):270.e1-270.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Experience With Opportunistic Salpingectomy in a Large, Community-Based Health System in the United States.美国大型社区医疗系统中机会性输卵管切除术的经验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):277-283. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001531.