Centre of Occupational Health, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, 100 42 Prague, Czech Republic.
Centre of Occupational Health, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, 100 42 Prague, Czech Republic.
Toxicol Lett. 2018 Dec 1;298:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.06.1212. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
Ethylene oxide (EO), an industrial intermediate and gaseous sterilant for medical devices, is carcinogenic to humans, which warrants minimization of exposure in the workplaces. The principal analytical strategy currently used in biomonitoring of exposure to EO consists in the conversion of N-(2-hydroxyethyl) adduct at the N-terminal valine (HEV) in globin to a specific thiohydantoin derivative accessible to GC-MS analysis (modified Edman degradation, MED). Though highly sensitive, the method is laborious and, at least in our hands, not sufficiently robust. Here we developed an alternative strategy of HEV determination based on acidic hydrolysis (AH) of globin followed directly by HPLC-ESI-MS analysis. Limit of quantitation is ca. 25 pmol HEV/g globin. Comparative analyses of globin samples from EO-exposed workers by both the AH-based and MED-based methods provided results that correlated well with each other (R > 0.95) but those obtained with AH were significantly more accurate (according to external quality control programme G-EQUAS) and repeatible (5% and 6% for intra-day and between-day analyses, respectively). In conclusion, the new AH-based method surpassed MED being similarly sensitive, much less laborious and more reliable, thus applicable as an effective tool for biomonitoring of EO in exposure control and risk assessment.
环氧乙烷(EO)是一种工业中间体和医疗器械的气态杀菌剂,对人类具有致癌性,因此有必要在工作场所尽量减少接触。目前,用于监测接触 EO 的生物标志物的主要分析策略包括将球蛋白中 N 末端缬氨酸(HEV)上的 N-(2-羟乙基)加合物转化为可通过 GC-MS 分析(改良 Edman 降解,MED)获得的特定硫代海因衍生物。虽然该方法非常灵敏,但繁琐,至少在我们手中,不够稳健。在这里,我们开发了一种基于球蛋白酸性水解(AH)的替代 HEV 测定策略,直接进行 HPLC-ESI-MS 分析。定量下限约为 25pmol HEV/g 球蛋白。通过基于 AH 和基于 MED 的方法对暴露于 EO 的工人的球蛋白样本进行比较分析,结果彼此之间相关性良好(R>0.95),但基于 AH 的方法更准确(根据外部质量控制计划 G-EQUAS)且重复性更好(日内和日间分析的分别为 5%和 6%)。总之,新的基于 AH 的方法优于 MED,因为它同样灵敏,工作量小且更可靠,因此适用于暴露控制和风险评估中 EO 的生物监测。