Moon H, Gudmundsson L, Seneviratne S I
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
J Geophys Res Atmos. 2018 Apr 16;123(7):3483-3496. doi: 10.1002/2017JD027577. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
The persistence of drought events largely determines the severity of socioeconomic and ecological impacts, but the capability of current global climate models (GCMs) to simulate such events is subject to large uncertainties. In this study, the representation of drought persistence in GCMs is assessed by comparing state-of-the-art GCM model simulations to observation-based data sets. For doing so, we consider dry-to-dry transition probabilities at monthly and annual scales as estimates for drought persistence, where a dry status is defined as negative precipitation anomaly. Though there is a substantial spread in the drought persistence bias, most of the simulations show systematic underestimation of drought persistence at global scale. Subsequently, we analyzed to which degree (i) inaccurate observations, (ii) differences among models, (iii) internal climate variability, and (iv) uncertainty of the employed statistical methods contribute to the spread in drought persistence errors using an analysis of variance approach. The results show that at monthly scale, model uncertainty and observational uncertainty dominate, while the contribution from internal variability is small in most cases. At annual scale, the spread of the drought persistence error is dominated by the statistical estimation error of drought persistence, indicating that the partitioning of the error is impaired by the limited number of considered time steps. These findings reveal systematic errors in the representation of drought persistence in current GCMs and suggest directions for further model improvement.
干旱事件的持续时间在很大程度上决定了社会经济和生态影响的严重程度,但当前全球气候模型(GCMs)模拟此类事件的能力存在很大不确定性。在本研究中,通过将最先进的GCM模型模拟与基于观测的数据集进行比较,评估了GCMs中干旱持续性的表现。为此,我们将月度和年度尺度上从干旱到干旱的转变概率作为干旱持续性的估计值,其中干旱状态被定义为负降水异常。尽管干旱持续性偏差存在很大差异,但大多数模拟结果表明,在全球尺度上,干旱持续性被系统性低估。随后,我们使用方差分析方法分析了(i)观测不准确、(ii)模型间差异、(iii)内部气候变率和(iv)所采用统计方法的不确定性在多大程度上导致了干旱持续性误差的差异。结果表明,在月度尺度上,模型不确定性和观测不确定性占主导,而在大多数情况下,内部变率的贡献较小。在年度尺度上,干旱持续性误差的差异主要由干旱持续性的统计估计误差主导,这表明误差的划分受到所考虑时间步长数量有限的影响。这些发现揭示了当前GCMs中干旱持续性表现的系统性误差,并为进一步改进模型指明了方向。