School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia.
School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Eur J Nutr. 2019 Jun;58(4):1369-1380. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1757-3. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Adherence to Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) is associated with the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, in intervention studies, there is discordance in the interpretation of a MedDiet. The purpose of this paper was to examine, synthesize, and develop a narrative review, exploring the qualitative differences in the interpretation of a modernized MedDiet prescribed as an intervention in clinical trials for the management of T2DM, and how closely this aligns with a traditional MedDiet. The 'traditional' MedDiet is often described as a dietary pattern high in unprocessed plant foods (fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, wholegrain cereals, and olive oil); moderate consumption of wine; low moderate in fish/shellfish; and an infrequent consumption of red meat, animal fats, vegetable oils, and processed foods.
Synthesis of the reviewed literature demonstrates considerable variation in the qualitative interpretation of a MedDiet. We also identified inadequate reporting of MedDiet interventions, despite a number of studies referring to their intervention as a 'traditional' MedDiet. The majority of studies emphasized the same key dietary components and principles: an increased intake of vegetables, wholegrains, and the preferential consumption of white meat in substitute of red and processed meat and abundant use of olive oil. However, the reporting of specific dietary recommendations for fruit, legumes, nuts, bread, red wine, and fermentable dairy products were less consistent or not reported. Irrespective of the discordance in the interpretation of a MedDiet, a number of studies included in the present review reported improved glycaemic control and favorable cardiovascular outcomes with adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet. Nevertheless, greater clarity and depth of reporting amongst intervention studies is warranted for the refinement of a modernized MedDiet definition that is distinct from a prudent dietary pattern.
地中海饮食(MedDiet)的依从性与 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的预防和管理有关。然而,在干预研究中,对 MedDiet 的解释存在不一致。本文的目的是检查、综合和撰写一篇叙述性评论,探索在临床试验中规定作为 T2DM 管理干预措施的现代化 MedDiet 的解释中的定性差异,以及这与传统 MedDiet 的吻合程度。“传统”MedDiet 通常被描述为一种饮食模式,富含未加工的植物性食物(水果、蔬菜、豆类、坚果、全谷物谷物和橄榄油);适量饮酒;适量食用鱼类/贝类;很少食用红肉、动物脂肪、植物油和加工食品。
对综述文献的综合分析表明,对 MedDiet 的定性解释存在很大差异。尽管许多研究将其干预措施称为“传统”MedDiet,但我们也发现对 MedDiet 干预措施的报告不足。大多数研究强调了相同的关键饮食成分和原则:增加蔬菜、全谷物和白肉的摄入量,以替代红肉和加工肉,并大量使用橄榄油。然而,对水果、豆类、坚果、面包、红酒和可发酵乳制品的具体饮食建议的报告则不太一致或未报告。尽管对 MedDiet 的解释存在不一致,但本综述中包含的许多研究报告称,遵循地中海式饮食可改善血糖控制和心血管结局。然而,干预研究需要更清晰和更深入的报告,以完善与谨慎饮食模式不同的现代化 MedDiet 定义。