Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Nutr Diet. 2019 Nov;76(5):521-531. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12441. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
To determine whether a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and a short dietary assessment tool can be used to accurately estimate the Eatwell Guide proportions (a plate-based food model) of diets of adults living in Scotland.
The cross-sectional study was conducted as a follow up of the 2010 Scottish Health Survey (participants aged 18-65 years old). Proportions of the Eatwell Guide food groups (starchy carbohydrates, fruits and vegetables (F&V), dairy and alternatives, protein foods and oils and spreads) were calculated from the Scottish Health Survey Eating Habits Module (SHeS EHM), Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ (SCG FFQ) and a seven-day estimated food diary (reference method), and compared using the Aitchison method and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Bland-Altman analyses assessed mean difference and 95% limits of agreement between the methods for each food group.
Ninety-six adults were included (mean (SD) age = 51.4 (11.1) years; body mass index = 27.1 (4.9) kg/m ; 58% female). The SCG FFQ scored a lower median Aitchison distance (1.47) than the SHeS EHM (1.99) (P < 0.001), showing greater agreement with the reference method (P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots also showed better agreement for the SCG FFQ than the SHeS EHM. Poorest agreement was for starchy carbohydrates (both methods), protein foods (SHeS EHM) and dairy (SCG FFQ).
The SCG FFQ could be used to estimate Eatwell Guide proportions and monitor compliance to the Eatwell Guide recommendations and could be improved with small changes. The SHeS EHM is less suitable, but additional questions on dairy foods, and oils and spreads would improve its ability to estimate the Eatwell Guide proportions.
确定食物频率问卷(FFQ)和简短饮食评估工具是否可用于准确估计苏格兰成年人饮食的“吃得好”指南比例(基于餐盘的食物模型)。
这项横断面研究是 2010 年苏格兰健康调查(参与者年龄 18-65 岁)的后续研究。通过苏格兰健康调查饮食习惯模块(SHeS EHM)、苏格兰协作组 FFQ(SCG FFQ)和七天估计食物日记(参考方法)计算“吃得好”指南食物组(淀粉类碳水化合物、水果和蔬菜(F&V)、乳制品和替代品、蛋白质食物以及油和涂抹酱)的比例,并使用 Aitchison 方法和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行比较。Bland-Altman 分析评估了每种食物组的方法之间的平均差异和 95%一致性界限。
共纳入 96 名成年人(平均(SD)年龄=51.4(11.1)岁;体重指数=27.1(4.9)kg/m2;58%为女性)。SCG FFQ 的 Aitchison 距离中位数(1.47)低于 SHeS EHM(1.99)(P<0.001),与参考方法更一致(P<0.001)。Bland-Altman 图也显示 SCG FFQ 的一致性优于 SHeS EHM。淀粉类碳水化合物(两种方法)、蛋白质食物(SHeS EHM)和乳制品(SCG FFQ)的一致性最差。
SCG FFQ 可用于估计“吃得好”指南的比例并监测对“吃得好”指南建议的遵守情况,通过进行微小的改动可以进一步提高其准确性。SHeS EHM 不太适用,但增加有关乳制品和油涂抹酱的问题将提高其估计“吃得好”指南比例的能力。