The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
The Carter Center, Jos, Nigeria.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Aug;99(2):396-403. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-1004. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
The western region of Edo state in southern Nigeria is highly endemic for onchocerciasis. Despite years of mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin (IVM), reports suggest persistently high prevalence of onchocerciasis, presumably because of poor coverage. In 2016, twice-per-year treatment with IVM (combined with albendazole for lymphatic filariasis in the first round where needed) began in five local government areas (LGAs) of Edo state. We undertook a multistage cluster survey within 3 months after each round of MDA to assess coverage. First-round coverage was poor: among 4,942 people of all ages interviewed from 145 clusters, coverage was 31.1% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 24.1-38.0%). Most respondents were not offered medicines. To improve coverage in the second round, three LGAs were randomized to receive MDA through a "modified campaign" approach focused on improved supervision and monitoring. The other two LGAs continued with standard MDA as before. A similar survey was conducted after the second round, interviewing 3,362 people in 87 clusters across the five LGAs. Coverage was not statistically different from the first round (40.0% [95% CI: 31.0-49.0%]) and there was no significant difference between the groups ( = 0.7), although the standard MDA group showed improvement over round 1 ( < 0.01). The additional cost per treatment in the modified MDA was 1.6 times that of standard MDA. Compliance was excellent among those offered treatment. We concluded that poor mobilization, medicine distribution, and program penetration led to low coverage. These must be addressed to improve treatment coverage in Edo state.
尼日利亚南部埃多州的西部地区高度流行盘尾丝虫病。尽管多年来一直采用伊维菌素(IVM)进行大规模药物治疗(MDA),但报告显示该病的流行率仍然很高,原因可能是覆盖面不足。2016 年,埃多州的五个地方政府区(LGAs)开始每半年接受一次 IVM 治疗(第一轮需要时与阿苯达唑联合治疗淋巴丝虫病)。在 MDA 每轮结束后 3 个月内,我们进行了多阶段聚类调查,以评估覆盖率。第一轮的覆盖率很低:在对 145 个聚类中的 4942 名所有年龄段的人进行访谈中,覆盖率为 31.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:24.1-38.0%)。大多数受访者没有获得药物。为了在第二轮提高覆盖率,将三个 LGAs 随机分配到接受 MDA 的方式,采用了以改进监督和监测为重点的“改良运动”方法。其他两个 LGAs 继续按照以前的标准 MDA 进行。第二轮结束后,在五个 LGAs 的 87 个聚类中进行了类似的调查,共采访了 3362 人。覆盖率与第一轮没有统计学差异(40.0%[95%CI:31.0-49.0%]),两组之间也没有差异(=0.7),尽管标准 MDA 组比第一轮有所改善(<0.01)。改良 MDA 中每次治疗的额外费用是标准 MDA 的 1.6 倍。提供治疗的人的依从性非常好。我们的结论是,动员不力、药物分发和方案渗透不足导致覆盖率低。必须解决这些问题,以提高埃多州的治疗覆盖率。