• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些心力衰竭患者应该接受专科姑息治疗?

Which patients with heart failure should receive specialist palliative care?

机构信息

BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

SNAHFS, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;20(9):1338-1347. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1240. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.1240
PMID:29952090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6607479/
Abstract

AIMS

We investigated which patients with heart failure (HF) should receive specialist palliative care (SPC) by first creating a definition of need for SPC in patients hospitalised with HF using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and then testing this definition using the outcome of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH). We also evaluated which baseline variables predicted need for SPC and whether those with this need received SPC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PROMs assessing quality of life (QoL), symptoms, and mood were administered at baseline and every 4 months. SPC need was defined as persistently severe impairment of any PROM without improvement (or severe impairment immediately preceding death). We then tested whether need for SPC, so defined, was reflected in DAOH, a measure which combines length of stay, days of hospital re-admission, and days lost due to death. Of 272 patients recruited, 74 (27%) met the definition of SPC needs. These patients lived one third fewer DAOH than those without SPC need (and less than a quarter of QoL-adjusted DAOH). A Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) summary score of <29 identified patients who subsequently had SPC needs (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78). Twenty-four per cent of patients with SPC needs actually received SPC (n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients hospitalised with HF had a need for SPC and were identified by a low KCCQ score on admission. Those with SPC need spent many fewer DAOH and their DAOH were of significantly worse quality. Very few patients with SPC needs accessed SPC services.

摘要

目的

我们通过使用患者报告结局测量(PROM)首先为因心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者创建接受专科姑息治疗(SPC)需求的定义,然后使用生存天数和出院天数(DAOH)的结果来检验该定义,从而研究哪些心力衰竭患者需要接受专科姑息治疗。我们还评估了哪些基线变量预测了 SPC 的需求,以及是否有需要的患者接受了 SPC。

方法和结果

在基线和每 4 个月时进行 PROM,评估生活质量(QoL)、症状和情绪。SPC 需要定义为任何 PROM 持续严重受损而无改善(或严重受损发生在死亡前)。然后,我们测试了如此定义的 SPC 需要是否反映在 DAOH 中,DAOH 是一种结合了住院时间、再次入院天数和因死亡而失去的天数的指标。在招募的 272 名患者中,74 名(27%)符合 SPC 需要的定义。这些患者的 DAOH 比没有 SPC 需要的患者少三分之一(不到 QoL 调整后的 DAOH 的四分之一)。Kansas City 心肌病问卷(KCCQ)总分<29 可识别随后有 SPC 需要的患者(接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.78)。有 SPC 需要的患者中有 24%实际上接受了 SPC(n=18)。

结论

四分之一因 HF 住院的患者需要 SPC,入院时 KCCQ 评分低即可识别。有 SPC 需要的患者 DAOH 明显减少,其 DAOH 质量显著较差。只有少数有 SPC 需要的患者获得了 SPC 服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/ae081be39abe/EJHF-20-1338-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/11c2e33ac0bc/EJHF-20-1338-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/5baca0f960bb/EJHF-20-1338-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/8242a6969fc1/EJHF-20-1338-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/ae081be39abe/EJHF-20-1338-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/11c2e33ac0bc/EJHF-20-1338-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/5baca0f960bb/EJHF-20-1338-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/8242a6969fc1/EJHF-20-1338-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1773/6607479/ae081be39abe/EJHF-20-1338-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Which patients with heart failure should receive specialist palliative care?哪些心力衰竭患者应该接受专科姑息治疗?
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;20(9):1338-1347. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1240. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Utilizing Quality of Life Adjusted Days Alive and Out of Hospital in Heart Failure Clinical Trials.利用生活质量调整的存活天数和心力衰竭临床试验中的住院天数。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 May;17(5):e010560. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010560. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Impact of cardiac resynchronisation therapy on burden of hospitalisations and survival: a retrospective observational study in the Northern Region of New Zealand.心脏再同步治疗对住院负担和生存率的影响:新西兰北部地区的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e025634. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025634.
4
Comparison of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire in Predicting Heart Failure Outcomes.堪萨斯城心肌病问卷和明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量问卷在预测心力衰竭结局方面的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;123(5):807-812. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.037. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Variation in Specialist Palliative Care Reach and Associated Factors Among People With Advanced Heart Failure in the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部晚期心力衰竭患者接受专科姑息治疗的差异及其相关因素。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jul;68(1):22-31.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
6
Palliative Care in Heart Failure: The PAL-HF Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.心力衰竭的姑息治疗:PAL-HF随机对照临床试验
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 18;70(3):331-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.030.
7
Association of Serial Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Assessments With Death and Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.连续堪萨斯城心肌病问卷评估与射血分数保留和降低的心衰患者死亡和住院的相关性:两项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;2(12):1315-1321. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3983.
8
Days alive and out of hospital and the patient journey in patients with heart failure: Insights from the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.心力衰竭患者的存活出院日和患者旅程:坎地沙坦治疗心力衰竭:降低死亡率和发病率评估(CHARM)研究计划的见解。
Am Heart J. 2011 Nov;162(5):900-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
9
Prevalence and characteristics of patients with heart failure needing palliative care.需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者的患病率和特征。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 2;20(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00850-y.
10
The use of specialist palliative care services differs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease: A national cohort study.专科姑息治疗服务在慢性阻塞性肺疾病和间质性肺疾病中的应用差异:一项全国队列研究。
Respir Med. 2025 Apr-May;240:108045. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108045. Epub 2025 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
National strategy for integrating palliative care into standard cardiac care for people living with heart failure: a position statement from the joint working group of the Swiss Societies of Cardiology and Palliative Care.将姑息治疗纳入心力衰竭患者标准心脏护理的国家战略:瑞士心脏病学会和姑息治疗学会联合工作组的立场声明
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 28;12:1548595. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1548595. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions to enable and reach patients with heart failure and their caregivers, with palliative care (TIER-HF-PC): a study protocol of a two-armed parallel group, open label randomised controlled trial that evaluates the effectiveness of a tiered model of palliative care in tertiary cardiac institutes in Singapore.心力衰竭患者及其照护者姑息治疗干预措施(TIER-HF-PC):一项双臂平行组、开放标签随机对照试验的研究方案,该试验评估新加坡三级心脏机构中分层姑息治疗模式的有效性。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 27;15(3):e100581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100581.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Palliative Care Use in Elderly Men and Women With Severe Heart Failure in the United States.美国老年男性和女性严重心力衰竭患者姑息治疗的使用趋势
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;2(3):344. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4517.
2
Palliative Care and Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.舒缓医疗与心血管疾病和中风:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会政策声明。
Circulation. 2016 Sep 13;134(11):e198-225. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000438. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Trends in Palliative Care Use in Veterans With Severe Heart Failure Using a Large National Cohort.
3
Validity and reliability of the palliative care needs assessment tool in Japanese patients with heart failure.心力衰竭日本患者的姑息治疗需求评估工具的有效性和可靠性。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):2967-2976. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14886. Epub 2024 May 29.
4
Creating more comparable cohorts in observational palliative care studies: A proposed framework to improve applicability and replicability of research.创建更具可比性的观察性姑息治疗研究队列:提高研究适用性和可重复性的建议框架。
Palliat Med. 2024 Jun;38(6):617-624. doi: 10.1177/02692163241234227. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
The experiences of patients with advanced heart failure, family carers, and health professionals with palliative care services: a secondary reflexive thematic analysis of longitudinal interview data.晚期心力衰竭患者、家庭护理者以及姑息治疗服务的卫生专业人员的体验:纵向访谈数据的二次反思性主题分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Aug 10;22(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01241-1.
6
Ten Questions and Some Reflections about Palliative Care in Advanced Heart Failure Patients.关于晚期心力衰竭患者姑息治疗的十个问题及一些思考
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6933. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236933.
7
Palliative care provision for people living with heart failure: The Geneva model.为心力衰竭患者提供的姑息治疗:日内瓦模式。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 25;9:933977. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.933977. eCollection 2022.
8
A Systematic Review of the Development and Implementation of Needs-Based Palliative Care Tools in Heart Failure and Chronic Respiratory Disease.心力衰竭和慢性呼吸系统疾病中基于需求的姑息治疗工具开发与实施的系统评价
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 13;9:878428. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.878428. eCollection 2022.
9
Symptom burden, psychosocial distress and palliative care needs in heart failure - A cross-sectional explorative pilot study.心力衰竭患者的症状负担、心理社会困扰和姑息治疗需求:一项横断面探索性初步研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Jan;112(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02017-y. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Advanced heart failure: guideline-directed medical therapy, diuretics, inotropes, and palliative care.晚期心力衰竭:指南指导的药物治疗、利尿剂、正性肌力药和姑息治疗。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1507-1523. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13859. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
使用大型全国队列研究重度心力衰竭退伍军人姑息治疗使用趋势
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;1(5):617-9. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1687.
4
Palliative care needs in patients hospitalized with heart failure (PCHF) study: rationale and design.心力衰竭住院患者的姑息治疗需求(PCHF)研究:原理与设计
ESC Heart Fail. 2015 Mar;2(1):25-36. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12027. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗特别工作组。由ESC心力衰竭协会(HFA)特别贡献制定。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.592. Epub 2016 May 20.
6
Risk prediction in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and analysis.心力衰竭患者的风险预测:系统评价和分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;2(5):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
7
Does the type and frequency of palliative care services received by patients with advanced heart failure impact symptom burden?晚期心力衰竭患者接受的姑息治疗服务的类型和频率是否会影响症状负担?
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;17(1):75-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0231. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
8
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):e240-327. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
9
Predicting survival in heart failure: a risk score based on 39 372 patients from 30 studies.预测心力衰竭患者的生存情况:基于 30 项研究的 39372 例患者的风险评分。
Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(19):1404-13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs337. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
Facilitating needs-based support and palliative care for people with chronic heart failure: preliminary evidence for the acceptability, inter-rater reliability, and validity of a needs assessment tool.为慢性心力衰竭患者提供基于需求的支持和姑息治疗:一种需求评估工具的可接受性、评分者间信度和有效性的初步证据。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 May;45(5):912-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Sep 25.