Grint P C, Ronalds C J, Kangro H O, Campbell-Benzie A, Ward F, Hardiman A E, Heath R B
J Clin Pathol. 1985 Sep;38(9):1059-64. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.9.1059.
Four hundred and ninety two samples of serum from blood donors were screened for the presence of antibodies specific to cytomegalovirus using radioimmunoassay, a modified complement fixation test, and five commercially available tests: the Cetus CMV IHA, Abbott CMV total AB EIA, Cytomegalisa Stat EIA, Enzygnost EIA, and Virenz G-CMV EIA. A wide variation in results was found, with only 53.5% of the sera giving total concordance by all methods. Rates of seropositivity in the different tests ranged from 34.9% to 59.3%, with sensitivities ranging from 75.2% to 99.1% compared with the radioimmunoassay. Of 211 sera which gave positive results with four or more of the tests, none was negative by the radioimmunoassay and Abbott EIA, three were negative in Cetus IHA and Enzygnost EIA, and 11 were negative in the modified complement fixation test. Virenz G and Cytomegalisa Stat EIAs, however, gave 40 (19%) and 49 (23.2%), respectively, as negative. The results confirmed the reliability of the radioimmunoassay for the detection of the antibody status to CMV, but this test is too elaborate for a screening procedure. The Abbott EIA and Cetus IHA were found to be the most suitable for this purpose in spite of high false positive rates.
采用放射免疫测定法、改良补体结合试验以及五种市售检测方法(Cetus巨细胞病毒间接血凝试验、雅培巨细胞病毒总抗体酶免疫测定、巨细胞病毒快速酶免疫测定、酶标免疫测定、Virenz G - 巨细胞病毒酶免疫测定),对492份献血者血清样本进行了巨细胞病毒特异性抗体筛查。结果发现,不同检测方法的结果差异很大,所有方法检测结果完全一致的血清仅占53.5%。不同检测方法的血清阳性率在34.9%至59.3%之间,与放射免疫测定法相比,灵敏度在75.2%至99.1%之间。在211份经四种或更多种检测方法检测呈阳性的血清中,放射免疫测定法和雅培酶免疫测定法检测结果均为阴性的样本一份也没有;在Cetus间接血凝试验和酶标免疫测定中,有3份样本检测结果为阴性;在改良补体结合试验中,有11份样本检测结果为阴性。然而,Virenz G酶免疫测定和巨细胞病毒快速酶免疫测定分别有40份(19%)和49份(23.2%)样本检测结果为阴性。结果证实了放射免疫测定法在检测巨细胞病毒抗体状态方面的可靠性,但该检测方法对于筛查程序来说过于繁琐。尽管假阳性率较高,但雅培酶免疫测定法和Cetus间接血凝试验被认为最适合用于此目的。