• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对患有和未患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的老年人使用的丹麦语版日常技术评估管理的重测信度和评分者间信度。

Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the Danish version of the management of everday technology assessment for use with older adults with and without COPD.

作者信息

Ballmer Thomas, Helle Tina, Kaptain Rina Juel, Malinowsky Camilla, Kottorp Anders

机构信息

a School of Health Professions, Institute of Occupational Therapy , ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences , Winterthur , Switzerland.

b Department of Occupational Therapy , University College North , Aalborg , Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Oct;26(6):463-474. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1476585. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1080/11038128.2018.1476585
PMID:29969329
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The trend towards telemedicine increasingly requires clients to manage everyday technology (ET) to access and use health services. The Management of Everday Technology Assessment (META) is an observation-based instrument developed to evaluate the ability to manage ET.

AIM

To examine test-retest (TRR) and inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the Danish translation of the META for older adults with and without COPD.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

47 older adults with COPD (n = 23) and without (n = 24) were recruited. IRR was examined by four raters paired across 30 participants. TRR was examined for 21 participants by the same rater administering the META twice within four weeks. A rank-based method for paired ordinal data was used to calculate percentage agreement (PA) and measures of systematic disagreement and individual variability. Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare PA to health status (presence/absence of COPD).

RESULTS

Inter-rater PA was acceptable across 10 of 11 items and test-retest PA across 8 of 11 items. Systematic disagreement was present for one item in TRR. No significant differences in PA were found regarding health status.

CONCLUSION

The Danish META generates reliable scores for this sample. However, conclusive statements cannot be made for all items.

摘要

背景

远程医疗的发展趋势越来越要求患者管理日常技术(ET)以获取和使用医疗服务。日常技术管理评估(META)是一种基于观察的工具,旨在评估管理ET的能力。

目的

检验丹麦语版META对有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和无COPD的老年人的重测信度(TRR)和评分者间信度(IRR)。

方法和材料

招募了47名老年人,其中23名患有COPD,24名未患COPD。由四名评分者对30名参与者进行配对,检验IRR。由同一名评分者在四周内对21名参与者进行两次META评估,检验TRR。使用基于秩次的配对有序数据方法计算百分比一致性(PA)以及系统不一致性和个体变异性的测量值。使用曼-惠特尼U检验比较PA与健康状况(是否患有COPD)。

结果

11项中的10项评分者间PA可接受,11项中的8项重测PA可接受。TRR中有一项存在系统不一致性。在PA方面,未发现健康状况有显著差异。

结论

丹麦语版META为本样本生成了可靠的分数。然而,不能对所有项目做出结论性陈述。

相似文献

1
Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the Danish version of the management of everday technology assessment for use with older adults with and without COPD.针对患有和未患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的老年人使用的丹麦语版日常技术评估管理的重测信度和评分者间信度。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Oct;26(6):463-474. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1476585. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
2
Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Danish version of the everyday technology use questionnaire.丹麦版日常技术使用问卷的评分者间信度和重测信度
Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Apr;26(3):226-234. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1395910. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
3
Stability of person ability measures in people with acquired brain injury in the use of everyday technology: the test-retest reliability of the Management of Everyday Technology Assessment (META).后天性脑损伤患者在使用日常技术时个人能力测量的稳定性:日常技术管理评估(META)的重测信度
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):395-9. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.968812. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
Translation, reliability, and clinical utility of the Melbourne Assessment 2.墨尔本评估2的翻译、信度及临床效用
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(2):226-234. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1386726. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
General motor function assessment scale--reliability of a Norwegian version.
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(20):1704-12. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.868045. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
6
The inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Self-care and Transfer scales, and intra-rater reliability of all scales of the Swedish Translation of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT-S).澳大利亚职业治疗疗效评估量表(AusTOMs-OT-S)瑞典语翻译版中自我护理和转移量表的评分者间信度及重测信度,以及所有量表的评分者内信度。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2013 May;20(3):182-9. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2013.777940. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Development, validity, and reliability of The Assessment of Pain and Occupational Performance (POP): a new instrument using two dimensions in the investigation of disability in back pain.疼痛与职业表现评估量表(POP)的开发、效度及信度:一种在腰痛残疾调查中采用两个维度的新工具
Spine J. 2009 Jun;9(6):486-98. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Apr 26.
8
The effect of rater training on scoring performance and scale-specific expertise amongst occupational therapists participating in a multicentre study: a single-group pre-post-test study.评分者培训对参与多中心研究的职业治疗师评分表现及特定量表专业知识的影响:单组前后测研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(12):1216-26. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1076069. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Danish version of 'The COPD self-efficacy scale': translation and psychometric properties.《慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我效能量表》丹麦语版本:翻译及心理测量特性
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Sep;26(3):615-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00963.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
10
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the item level of the Action Research Arm Test for patients with stroke.动作研究上肢测试在脑卒中患者中项目水平的评定者间信度和评定者内信度。
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Sep;46(8):738-45. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1831.

引用本文的文献

1
New Insights into Activities of Daily Living Performance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病日常生活活动表现的新见解。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jan 7;16:1-12. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S264365. eCollection 2021.