Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 EV, The Netherlands.
eNeuro. 2018 Jul 2;5(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0408-17.2018. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
Expressions of emotion are powerful triggers for situation-appropriate responses by the observer. Of particular interest regarding the preparation of such adaptive actions are parietal and premotor cortices, given their potential for interaction with the amygdala (AMG), which is known to play a crucial role in the processing of affective information and in motor response. We set out to disentangle the respective roles of the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and ventral premotor cortex (PMv) in humans in the processing of emotional body expressions by assessing remote effects of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) in the action network and in AMG. Participants were presented with blocks of short videos showing either angry or neutral whole-body actions. The experiment consisted of three fMRI sessions: two sessions were preceded by stimulation of either right IPL (rIPL) or right PMv (rPMv); and a third session assessed baseline activity. Interestingly, whereas at baseline the left AMG did not differentiate between neutral and angry body postures, a significant difference between these conditions emerged after stimulation of either rIPL or rPMv, with much larger responses to angry than to neutral stimuli. In addition, the effects of cTBS stimulation and emotion were also observed in two other action-relevant areas, the supplementary motor area and the superior parietal cortex. Together, these results show how areas involved in action and emotion perception and in action preparation interact dynamically.
情绪表达是观察者做出情境适当反应的有力触发因素。就此类适应性动作的准备而言,顶叶和前运动皮层特别有趣,因为它们可能与杏仁核(AMG)相互作用,而杏仁核已知在处理情感信息和运动反应方面发挥着至关重要的作用。我们着手通过评估动作网络和 AMG 中连续 theta 爆发刺激(cTBS)的远程效应,来区分人类下顶叶小叶(IPL)和腹侧前运动皮层(PMv)在处理情感身体表达中的各自作用。参与者观看了一系列展示愤怒或中性全身动作的短视频。该实验由三个 fMRI 会话组成:两个会话之前分别对右侧 IPL(rIPL)或右侧 PMv(rPMv)进行了刺激;第三个会话评估了基线活动。有趣的是,尽管在基线时,左 AMG 无法区分中性和愤怒的身体姿势,但在刺激 rIPL 或 rPMv 之后,这两种情况之间出现了显著差异,对愤怒刺激的反应明显大于对中性刺激的反应。此外,cTBS 刺激和情绪的影响也在另外两个与动作相关的区域,即辅助运动区和顶叶上回观察到。总之,这些结果表明了参与动作和情绪感知以及动作准备的区域是如何动态地相互作用的。