Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Museum of Natural History, Ecoanthropology and Ethnobiology, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France.
Science. 2018 Jul 6;361(6397):88-92. doi: 10.1126/science.aat3628.
The human occupation history of Southeast Asia (SEA) remains heavily debated. Current evidence suggests that SEA was occupied by Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers until ~4000 years ago, when farming economies developed and expanded, restricting foraging groups to remote habitats. Some argue that agricultural development was indigenous; others favor the "two-layer" hypothesis that posits a southward expansion of farmers giving rise to present-day Southeast Asian genetic diversity. By sequencing 26 ancient human genomes (25 from SEA, 1 Japanese Jōmon), we show that neither interpretation fits the complexity of Southeast Asian history: Both Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers and East Asian farmers contributed to current Southeast Asian diversity, with further migrations affecting island SEA and Vietnam. Our results help resolve one of the long-standing controversies in Southeast Asian prehistory.
东南亚(SEA)的人类居住历史仍存在很大争议。目前的证据表明,SEA 地区曾被豪比恩人狩猎采集者居住,直到约 4000 年前,农耕经济发展并扩张,将觅食群体限制在偏远的栖息地。一些人认为农业发展是本土的;另一些人则赞成“双层假说”,即主张农民向南扩张,从而产生了当今东南亚的遗传多样性。通过对 26 个古人类基因组(SEA 地区 25 个,日本绳文人 1 个)进行测序,我们发现这两种解释都不符合东南亚历史的复杂性:豪比恩人狩猎采集者和东亚农民都对当今东南亚的多样性做出了贡献,进一步的迁徙影响了岛屿东南亚和越南。我们的研究结果有助于解决东南亚史前史中一个长期存在的争议。