North Alexander S, Wilkinson Tracey
University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2018 Aug;13(2):69-74. doi: 10.1007/s11751-018-0314-1. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common, tending to occur secondary to traumatic injuries. Rockwood grade IV, V and VI injuries involve complete dislocation of the joint and require surgical reconstruction, with inconclusive literature on whether grade III injuries should be surgically or conservatively managed. There are over one hundred reported surgical techniques which reconstruct the AC joint, with little indication of which methods achieve the best results. Techniques can generally be considered as: anatomical reduction; CC ligament reconstruction; and anatomical reconstruction. Techniques which implant hardware to reduce the AC joint, such as the hook plate, are commonly implemented, but have been shown to alter the mechanics of the joint significantly, resulting in poor short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods which reconstruct both the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments are comparatively new, and early reports suggest that they achieve biomechanical properties similar to the native joint. More focus should be placed on such techniques in the future to determine whether they offer a more suitable approach to improve patient outcomes following AC joint reconstruction.
肩锁关节(AC)损伤很常见,往往继发于创伤性损伤。Rockwood IV级、V级和VI级损伤涉及关节完全脱位,需要手术重建,而关于III级损伤应采用手术治疗还是保守治疗,文献尚无定论。有超过一百种报道的手术技术可用于重建肩锁关节,但几乎没有迹象表明哪种方法能取得最佳效果。这些技术通常可分为:解剖复位;喙锁韧带重建;以及解剖重建。采用植入硬件来复位肩锁关节的技术,如钩钢板,应用广泛,但已证明会显著改变关节力学,导致短期和长期效果不佳。同时重建肩锁韧带和喙锁韧带的方法相对较新,早期报告表明它们能达到与天然关节相似的生物力学特性。未来应更多关注此类技术,以确定它们是否为改善肩锁关节重建术后患者预后提供更合适的方法。