Suppr超能文献

情感、风险感知与香烟和电子烟的使用:美国成年人的一项人群研究。

Affect, risk perception, and the use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a population study of U.S. adults.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3995, Atlanta, GA, 30302-3995, USA.

Decision Research, 1201 Oak Street, Suite 200, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 22;18(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5306-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tobacco companies argue that the decision to smoke is made by well-informed rational adults who have considered all the risks and benefits of smoking. Yet in promoting their products, the tobacco industry frequently relies on affect, portraying their products as part of a desirable lifestyle. Research examining the roles of affect and perceived risks in smoking has been scant and non-existent for novel tobacco products, such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes).

METHODS

We examined the relationship between affect, perceived risk, and current use for cigarettes and e-cigarettes in 2015 in a nationally representative sample of 5398 U.S. adults who were aware of e-cigarettes.

RESULTS

Participants held various affective associations with tobacco products, and affect towards cigarettes was more negative than affect towards e-cigarettes. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), affect towards cigarettes and e-cigarettes was associated with cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use respectively, and these associations were both direct and partially mediated by risk perceptions towards smoking and e-cigarette use. More positive affect towards cigarettes or e-cigarettes was associated with lower perceived risks, which in turn was associated with higher odds of being a current cigarette or e-cigarette user.

CONCLUSIONS

In developing models explaining tobacco use behavior, or in creating public communication campaigns aimed at curbing tobacco use, it is useful to focus not only on the reason based predictors, such as perceptions of risks and benefits, but also on affective predictors. Educational efforts aimed at further smoking reductions should highlight and reinforce negative images and associations with cigarettes.

摘要

背景

烟草公司认为,吸烟的决定是由知情的理性成年人做出的,他们已经考虑了吸烟的所有风险和益处。然而,在推销产品时,烟草行业经常依赖情感因素,将其产品描绘成理想生活方式的一部分。研究影响和感知风险在吸烟中的作用的研究很少,对于电子烟等新型烟草产品更是如此。

方法

我们在 2015 年对美国全国代表性的 5398 名成年人进行了一项调查,这些成年人了解电子烟,调查了他们对香烟和电子烟的情感、感知风险与当前使用之间的关系。

结果

参与者对烟草产品有不同的情感联想,对香烟的情感比对电子烟的情感更负面。使用结构方程模型(SEM),对香烟和电子烟的情感与吸烟和电子烟的使用分别相关,这些关联既直接又部分通过对吸烟和电子烟使用的风险感知来介导。对香烟或电子烟的积极情感与较低的感知风险相关,而感知风险又与作为当前吸烟者或电子烟使用者的几率较高相关。

结论

在开发解释烟草使用行为的模型或创建旨在遏制烟草使用的公共宣传活动时,不仅关注基于理性的预测因素,如对风险和益处的感知,还关注情感预测因素是有用的。旨在进一步减少吸烟的教育工作应强调和强化与香烟相关的负面形象和联想。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0646/5863900/70233810c5d0/12889_2018_5306_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验