Suppr超能文献

急性单纯性憩室炎不使用抗生素的管理:治疗失败预测因素的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。

Management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis without antibiotics: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of predictors of treatment failure.

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Elgomhuoria Street, Mansoura City, Egypt.

Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jul;22(7):499-509. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1817-y. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diverticulitis is a common complication of diverticular disease of the colon. While complicated diverticulitis often warrants intervention, acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) is usually managed conservatively. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conservative treatment of AUD without antibiotics compared to standard antibiotic treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature review in compliance with PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched. Studies that assessed efficacy and safety of treatment of AUD without antibiotics were included. Outcome parameters were rates of treatment failure, recurrence of diverticulitis, complications and mortality, readmission to hospital, and need for surgery.

RESULTS

Nine studies including 2565 patients were included to the review. Of these patients, 65.1% were treated conservatively without antibiotics. Treatment failure was observed in 5.1% of patients not-given-antibiotic treatment versus 3.4% of those given antibiotic treatment. Recurrent diverticulitis occurred in 9.3% of patients in the non-antibiotic group versus 12.1% of patients in the antibiotic group. On meta-analysis of the studies, there were no significant differences between non-antibiotic and antibiotic treatment groups regarding rates of treatment failure (OR = 1.5, p = 0.06), recurrence of diverticulitis (OR = 0.81, p = 0.2), complications (OR = 0.56, p = 0.25), readmission rates (OR = 0.97, p = 0.91), need for surgery (OR = 0.59, p = 0.28), and mortality (OR = 0.64, p = 0.47). The only variable that was significantly associated with treatment failure in the non-antibiotic treatment group was associated comorbidities (standard error (SE) = - 0.07, 95% CI - 0.117 - 0.032; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of AUD without antibiotics is feasible, safe, and effective. Adding broad-spectrum antibiotics to the treatment regimen did not serve to decrease treatment failure, recurrence, complications, hospital readmissions, and need for surgery significantly compared to non-antibiotic treatment.

摘要

背景

憩室炎是结肠憩室病的常见并发症。虽然复杂的憩室炎通常需要干预,但急性单纯性憩室炎(AUD)通常采用保守治疗。本综述的目的是评估 AUD 不使用抗生素进行保守治疗与标准抗生素治疗相比的疗效和安全性。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南进行系统的文献回顾。检索了电子数据库,包括 PubMed/Medline、Scopus、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。纳入评估 AUD 不使用抗生素治疗的疗效和安全性的研究。观察参数为治疗失败率、憩室炎复发率、并发症和死亡率、再入院率和手术需求。

结果

共纳入 9 项研究,包括 2565 例患者。其中,65.1%的患者接受了不使用抗生素的保守治疗。未接受抗生素治疗的患者中,治疗失败率为 5.1%,而接受抗生素治疗的患者为 3.4%。非抗生素组的憩室炎复发率为 9.3%,抗生素组为 12.1%。对研究进行荟萃分析,非抗生素组和抗生素组之间在治疗失败率(OR=1.5,p=0.06)、憩室炎复发率(OR=0.81,p=0.2)、并发症发生率(OR=0.56,p=0.25)、再入院率(OR=0.97,p=0.91)、手术需求(OR=0.59,p=0.28)和死亡率(OR=0.64,p=0.47)方面均无显著差异。非抗生素治疗组中唯一与治疗失败显著相关的变量是合并症(标准误(SE)= -0.07,95%置信区间(CI)为-0.117 至-0.032;p<0.001)。

结论

不使用抗生素治疗 AUD 是可行的、安全的且有效的。与非抗生素治疗相比,在治疗方案中添加广谱抗生素并不能显著降低治疗失败、复发、并发症、住院再入院和手术需求的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验