Figueiredo S, Taconet C, Harrois A, Hamada S, Gauss T, Raux M, Duranteau J
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, University Paris-Sud, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Jul 6;8(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0420-8.
The diagnostic value of hemoglobin (Hb) for detecting a significant hemorrhage (SH) in the early phase of trauma remains controversial. The present study aimed to assess the abilities of Hb measurements taken at different times throughout trauma management to identify patients with SH.
All consecutive adult trauma patients directly admitted to six French level-1 trauma centers with at least one prehospital Hb measurement were analyzed. The abilities of the following variables to identify SH (≥ 4 units of red blood cells in the first 6 h and/or death related to uncontrolled bleeding within 24 h) were determined and compared to that of shock index (SI): Hb as measured with a point-of-care (POC) device by the prehospital team on scene (POC-Hb) and upon patient's admission to the hospital (POC-Hb), the difference between POC-Hb and POC-Hb (DeltaPOC-Hb) and Hb as measured by the hospital laboratory on admission (Hb-Lab).
A total of 6402 patients were included, 755 with SH and 5647 controls (CL). POC-Hb significantly predicted SH with an area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.72 and best cutoff values of 12 g/dl for women and 13 g/dl for men. POC-Hb < 12 g/dl had 90% specificity to predict of SH. POC-Hb and Hb-Lab (AUCs of 0.92 and 0.89, respectively) predicted SH better than SI (AUC = 0.77, p < 0.001); best cutoff values of POC-Hb were 10 g/dl for women and 12 g/dl for men. DeltaPOC-Hb also predicted SH with an AUC of 0.77, a best cutoff value of - 2 g/dl irrespective of the gender. For a same prehospital fluid volume infused, DeltaPOC-Hb was significantly larger in patients with significant hemorrhage than in controls.
Challenging the classical idea that early Hb measurement is not meaningful in predicting SH, POC-Hb was able, albeit modestly, to predict significant hemorrhage. POC-Hb had a greater ability to predict SH when compared to shock index. For a given prehospital fluid volume infused, the magnitude of the Hb drop was significantly higher in patients with significant hemorrhage than in controls.
血红蛋白(Hb)在创伤早期检测严重出血(SH)的诊断价值仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估在创伤治疗全过程不同时间点测量Hb以识别SH患者的能力。
对直接入住法国6家一级创伤中心且至少有一次院前Hb测量值的所有连续成年创伤患者进行分析。确定以下变量识别SH(最初6小时内输注≥4单位红细胞和/或24小时内死于难以控制的出血)的能力,并与休克指数(SI)进行比较:院前急救团队在现场使用即时检测(POC)设备测量的Hb(POC-Hb)以及患者入院时测量的Hb(POC-Hb)、POC-Hb与POC-Hb的差值(DeltaPOC-Hb)以及入院时医院实验室测量的Hb(Hb-Lab)。
共纳入6402例患者,其中755例为SH患者,5647例为对照(CL)组。POC-Hb对SH有显著预测价值,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.72,女性最佳临界值为12 g/dl,男性为13 g/dl。POC-Hb < 12 g/dl预测SH的特异性为90%。POC-Hb和Hb-Lab(AUC分别为0.92和0.89)对SH的预测优于SI(AUC = 0.77,p < 0.001);POC-Hb的最佳临界值女性为10 g/dl,男性为12 g/dl。DeltaPOC-Hb也能预测SH,AUC为0.77,无论性别最佳临界值均为-2 g/dl。对于相同的院前输注液体量,严重出血患者的DeltaPOC-Hb显著大于对照组。
挑战早期Hb测量对预测SH无意义这一传统观念,POC-Hb虽能力有限,但能够预测严重出血。与休克指数相比,POC-Hb预测SH的能力更强。对于给定的院前输注液体量,严重出血患者的Hb下降幅度显著高于对照组。