University of Vienna, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
University of Vienna, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Währingerstraße 42, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018 Sep;130:214-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Vibrational spectroscopy is a useful tool for analysis of skin properties and to confirm the penetration of drugs and other formulation compounds into the skin. In particular, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy and confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS) have been optimised for skin analysis. Despite an impressive amount of data on these techniques, a comparative methodological assessment for skin penetration monitoring of model substances is still amiss. Thus, in vitro skin penetration studies were conducted in parallel using the same porcine material and four model substances, namely sodium laureth sulfate (SLES), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sulfathiazole sodium (STZ) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). ATR-FTIR spectroscopy in combination with tape stripping and CRS were employed to evaluate the skin penetration of the applied substances. In addition, the skin hydration status or change in skin hydration after application was investigated. The results show that both methods provide valuable information on the skin penetration potential of applied substances. The penetration profiles determined by CRS or ATR-FTIR/tape stripping were comparable for all substances; a slow decrease in relative substance concentration was visible from the skin surface inwards within the stratum corneum (SC). In general, deeper penetration into the SC was observed with CRS, which may be related to the depth resolution of the employed device. However, when related to the respective total SC thickness of each experiment, the penetration depths determined by parallel CRS and ATR-FTIR analysis were in good agreement for all model substances. The observed order of the penetration depth was DMSO > SDS > SLES > STZ with both techniques. A decrease of the relative concentration to 10% of the maximum value was found approximately between 34 and 89% of total SC thickness. Summarising these findings, advantages and drawbacks of the two techniques for in vitro skin penetration studies are discussed.
振动光谱学是分析皮肤性质和确认药物及其他制剂化合物穿透皮肤的有用工具。特别是,衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外(ATR-FTIR)光谱和共焦拉曼光谱(CRS)已被优化用于皮肤分析。尽管这些技术有大量的数据,但对于模型物质的皮肤穿透监测的比较方法评估仍然缺乏。因此,使用相同的猪皮材料和四种模型物质(月桂醇聚醚硫酸酯钠(SLES)、十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)、磺胺噻唑钠(STZ)和二甲基亚砜(DMSO))同时进行了体外皮肤渗透研究。ATR-FTIR 光谱结合胶带剥离和 CRS 用于评估应用物质的皮肤穿透。此外,还研究了皮肤的水合状态或应用后皮肤水合的变化。结果表明,两种方法都为应用物质的皮肤穿透潜力提供了有价值的信息。通过 CRS 或 ATR-FTIR/胶带剥离确定的渗透曲线对于所有物质都是可比的;在角质层(SC)内,从皮肤表面向内可见相对物质浓度缓慢下降。一般来说,CRS 观察到更深的 SC 穿透,这可能与所使用设备的深度分辨率有关。然而,当与每个实验的各自总 SC 厚度相关时,通过平行 CRS 和 ATR-FTIR 分析确定的渗透深度在所有模型物质中非常吻合。两种技术观察到的渗透深度顺序为 DMSO > SDS > SLES > STZ。在两种技术中,相对浓度降至最大值的 10%,大约在 34%和 89%的总 SC 厚度之间。总结这些发现,讨论了这两种技术用于体外皮肤渗透研究的优缺点。