Centro de Calidad Avícola y Alimentación Animal de la Comunidad Valenciana (CECAV), Castellon, Spain.
Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas. Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Poult Sci. 2018 Dec 1;97(12):4367-4373. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey294.
Notwithstanding the National Salmonella Control Programs, the latest data published by the European Food Safety Authority show an increase in Salmonella Enteritidis prevalence in laying hen flocks. For this reason, the implementation of innovative techniques such as phage therapy is needed to control Salmonella at farm level. Most common bacteriophage applications are a cocktail of 2 or more bacteriophages, as it has been described that cocktails could remove different Salmonella serotypes, thus providing cross efficacy. Nevertheless, resistance to the bacteriophage cocktail has been reported, resulting in a decrease in their effectiveness. Along these lines, some authors have reported the possibility of using autophage when commercial bacteriophage cocktails are not active against field strains. To our best knowledge, no autophage (bacteriophage isolated from the same environment where the pathogen is isolated) has been found to control Salmonella in laying hens. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the application of autophage in reducing Salmonella Enteritidis in environmental and fecal samples in a layer farm. To this end, the bacteriophage was isolated from the same farm where the bacteria was present and was applied onto the facility installations and the animals, at 2 different times. After bacteriophage challenges, swab cloths from facility surfaces and feces samples were collected at 3 times according to the time spent after the bacteriophage challenge. The results obtained in our study showed that all the surface samples collected from the farm facilities after phage therapy were negative for Salmonella. Concerning faces samples, statistical differences were found in Salmonella counts, with the strongest decrease (1.78log10) occurring after the second challenge. Otherwise, depending of the moment of sampling, the results obtained were 2.34log10, 1.39log10, 0.56log10, and 0.97log10 cfu/g for T0, T1, T2, and T3 respectively. The study highlights the use of autophage therapy not only for Salmonella Enteritidis control in animals, but as a sanitizer in cleaning and disinfection.
尽管有国家沙门氏菌控制计划,但欧洲食品安全局最新公布的数据显示,蛋鸡群中肠炎沙门氏菌的流行率有所增加。出于这个原因,需要实施噬菌体治疗等创新技术来控制农场层面的沙门氏菌。最常见的噬菌体应用是两种或更多种噬菌体的混合物,因为已经描述过鸡尾酒可以去除不同的沙门氏菌血清型,从而提供交叉功效。然而,已经报道了对噬菌体鸡尾酒的耐药性,导致其效果降低。在这方面,一些作者报告了在商业噬菌体鸡尾酒对田间菌株无效时使用自体噬菌体的可能性。据我们所知,在蛋鸡中尚未发现任何自体噬菌体(从分离病原体的同一环境中分离出的噬菌体)来控制沙门氏菌。在这种情况下,本研究的目的是评估自体噬菌体在减少蛋鸡环境和粪便样本中肠炎沙门氏菌的应用。为此,从存在细菌的同一农场中分离出噬菌体,并在 2 个不同时间应用于设施设备和动物。在噬菌体挑战后,根据噬菌体挑战后花费的时间,从设施表面和粪便样本中采集拭子布。我们的研究结果表明,噬菌体治疗后从农场设施收集的所有表面样本均未检出沙门氏菌。关于面部样本,沙门氏菌计数存在统计学差异,第二次挑战后降幅最大(1.78log10)。否则,根据采样时间的不同,结果分别为 T0、T1、T2 和 T3 时的 2.34log10、1.39log10、0.56log10 和 0.97log10cfu/g。该研究强调了自体噬菌体治疗不仅可用于控制动物中的肠炎沙门氏菌,还可用作清洁和消毒的消毒剂。