Suppr超能文献

一种基于知识的盆腔容积调强放疗计划的交互式计划与模型演化方法

An interactive plan and model evolution method for knowledge-based pelvic VMAT planning.

作者信息

Wang Meijiao, Li Sha, Huang Yuliang, Yue Haizhen, Li Tian, Wu Hao, Gao Song, Zhang Yibao

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Medical Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Sep;19(5):491-498. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12403. Epub 2018 Jul 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test if a RapidPlan DVH estimation model and its training plans can be improved interactively through a closed-loop evolution process.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty-one manual plans (P ) that were used to configure an initial rectal RapidPlan model (M ) were reoptimized using M (closed-loop), yielding 81 P plans. The 75 improved P (P ) and the remaining 6 P were used to configure model M . The 81 training plans were reoptimized again using M , producing 23 P plans that were superior to both their P and P forms (P ). Hence, the knowledge base of model M composed of 6 P , 52 P , and 23 P . Models were tested dosimetrically on 30 VMAT validation cases (P ) that were not used for training, yielding P (M ), P (M ), and P (M ) respectively. The 30 P were also optimized by M as trained by the library of M and 30 P (M ).

RESULTS

Based on comparable target dose coverage, the first closed-loop reoptimization significantly (P < 0.01) reduced the 81 training plans' mean dose to femoral head, urinary bladder, and small bowel by 2.65 Gy/15.63%, 2.06 Gy/8.11%, and 1.47 Gy/6.31% respectively, which were further reduced significantly (P < 0.01) in the second closed-loop reoptimization by 0.04 Gy/0.28%, 0.18 Gy/0.77%, 0.22 Gy/1.01% respectively. However, open-loop VMAT validations displayed more complex and intertwined plan quality changes: mean dose to urinary bladder and small bowel decreased monotonically using M (by 0.34 Gy/1.47%, 0.25 Gy/1.13%) and M (by 0.36 Gy/1.56%, 0.30 Gy/1.36%) than using M . However, mean dose to femoral head increased by 0.81 Gy/6.64% (M ) and 0.91 Gy/7.46% (M ) than using M . The overfitting problem was relieved by applying model M .

CONCLUSIONS

The RapidPlan model and its constituent plans can improve each other interactively through a closed-loop evolution process. Incorporating new patients into the original training library can improve the RapidPlan model and the upcoming plans interactively.

摘要

目的

测试快速计划剂量体积直方图(DVH)估计模型及其训练计划能否通过闭环演化过程进行交互式改进。

方法与材料

用于配置初始直肠快速计划模型(M)的81个手动计划(P)使用M进行重新优化(闭环),得到81个P计划。75个改进后的P(P)和其余6个P用于配置模型M。使用M再次对81个训练计划进行重新优化,产生23个优于其P和P形式的P计划(P)。因此,模型M的知识库由6个P、52个P和23个P组成。在30个未用于训练的容积调强放疗(VMAT)验证病例(P)上对模型进行剂量学测试,分别得到P(M)、P(M)和P(M)。30个P也由M按照M库训练的方式进行优化,得到30个P(M)。

结果

基于可比的靶区剂量覆盖,第一次闭环重新优化显著(P < 0.01)降低了81个训练计划对股骨头、膀胱和小肠 的平均剂量,分别降低了2.65 Gy/15.63%、2.06 Gy/8.11%和1.47 Gy/6.31%,在第二次闭环重新优化中进一步显著(P < 0.01)降低,分别为0.04 Gy/0.28%、0.18 Gy/0.77%、0.22 Gy/1.01%。然而,开环VMAT验证显示出更复杂且相互交织的计划质量变化情况:使用M(分别降低0.34 Gy/1.47%、0.25 Gy/1.13%)和M(分别降低0.36 Gy/1.56%、0.30 Gy/1.36%)时,膀胱和小肠的平均剂量比使用M时单调下降。然而,使用M时,股骨头的平均剂量比使用M时分别增加了0.81 Gy/6.64%(M)和0.91 Gy/7.46%(M)。应用模型M缓解了过拟合问题。

结论

快速计划模型及其组成计划可通过闭环演化过程进行交互式改进。将新患者纳入原始训练库可交互式改进快速计划模型和后续计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3edb/6123168/f9430c53e6d2/ACM2-19-491-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验