• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估面向公众的医学信息图表材料的可读性水平。

Evaluating the readability levels of medical infographic materials for public consumption.

作者信息

Royal Kenneth D, Erdmann Kristan M

机构信息

a Educational Assessment & Outcomes , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , NC , USA.

b Athletic Training Program , Murray State University , Murray , KY , USA.

出版信息

J Vis Commun Med. 2018 Jul;41(3):99-102. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2018.1476059. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1080/17453054.2018.1476059
PMID:29987964
Abstract

Readability is an important element of any published material. In recent years, various health organisations have utilised infographics to communicate important medical information. Established guidelines for readability suggest levels should be targeted between a 4th and 6th grade education level (United States) in order to avoid disadvantaging individuals with lower literacy skills. The purpose of this case study was to evaluate the readability levels of several published materials from the field of athletic training and demonstrate a model for evaluating readability levels in other medical and health professions.

摘要

可读性是任何已发表材料的重要元素。近年来,各种健康组织利用信息图表来传达重要的医学信息。既定的可读性指南建议,为避免使读写能力较低的人处于不利地位,应将阅读水平目标设定在美国四年级至六年级教育水平之间。本案例研究的目的是评估运动训练领域几种已发表材料的可读性水平,并展示一种评估其他医学和健康专业可读性水平的模型。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the readability levels of medical infographic materials for public consumption.评估面向公众的医学信息图表材料的可读性水平。
J Vis Commun Med. 2018 Jul;41(3):99-102. doi: 10.1080/17453054.2018.1476059. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
2
Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review.CKD 患者阅读材料的易读性:系统评价。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):842-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
3
Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.眼科患者教育材料的可读性:一项单机构研究及系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0.
4
Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.美国运动医学学会网站上患者教育材料的可读性。
Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Nov;42(4):125-30. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2099.
5
Evaluation of internet-based patient education materials from internal medicine subspecialty organizations: will patients understand them?对内科亚专业组织基于互联网的患者教育材料的评估:患者能理解这些材料吗?
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;12(4):535-543. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1611-2. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
6
Are we failing to communicate? Internet-based patient education materials and radiation safety.我们是否沟通不畅?基于互联网的患者教育材料与辐射安全。
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Sep;83(9):1698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.脊柱相关患者教育资料的易读性:来自专业组织和脊柱医生网站的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c.
8
Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.在线眼科患者信息的可读性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.
9
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.基于互联网的乳腺癌筛查乳腺X线摄影相关患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
10
Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.提高在线足踝患者教育材料的可读性。
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Dec;35(12):1282-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100714550650. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer focus group testing with stakeholders to generate an enteral resuscitation training flipbook for primary health center and first-level hospital providers in Nepal.与利益相关者进行消费者焦点小组测试,为尼泊尔的基层医疗中心和一级医院的提供者生成肠内复苏培训翻页书。
Burns. 2024 Jun;50(5):1160-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
An Evaluation of an Environmental Health Infographic in Community Settings.社区环境健康信息图评估。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059290. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059290.
3
Preparing Infographics for Post-publication Promotion of Research on Social Media.
准备信息图以在社交媒体上推广已发表的研究成果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb 1;36(5):e41. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e41.
4
Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?新冠疫情健康网站:它们是否足够易于阅读且值得信赖,从而能帮助公众进行自我护理?
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):75-83. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1020.
5
Perinatal COVID-19 Infection Prevention: Infographics for Patients and Providers.围产期新冠病毒感染预防:面向患者和医护人员的信息图表
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Oct;37(12):1185-1188. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714387. Epub 2020 Jul 19.