• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化和语言背景各异的老年人与主流长期护理机构:观点与经历的综合综述

Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Older Adults and Mainstream Long-Term Care Facilities: Integrative Review of Views and Experiences.

作者信息

Montayre Jed, Montayre Jasmine, Thaggard Sandra

出版信息

Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018 Sep 1;11(5):265-276. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20180629-02. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

DOI:10.3928/00989134-20180629-02
PMID:29989643
Abstract

Older adults from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds are increasingly identified within mainstream aging populations. However, few studies have focused on CALD older adults' views and experiences in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The current integrative review aimed to achieve a contemporary understanding through synthesized evidence from studies focusing on CALD older adults in mainstream LTCFs. Two major categories were identified-Views About LTCFs, which included two subcategories: (a) the last stop and no other choice and (b) reasons for admission or transfer; and Experiences of Living in LTCFs, which also included two subcategories: (a) desire to remain connected to personal routines and (b) maintaining identity through native language. CALD older adults have differing perspectives about LTCFs, which are influenced by their cultural backgrounds and values. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of ethno-specific LTCFs. Establishing culturally appropriate services for CALD older adults in LTCFs, particularly in mainstream facilities, should emphasize cultural accommodation among residents, health care providers, and staff. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018; 11(5):265-276.].

摘要

来自文化和语言背景多元(CALD)的老年人在主流老年人群体中越来越多地被识别出来。然而,很少有研究关注CALD老年人在长期护理机构(LTCF)中的观点和经历。当前的综合综述旨在通过对关注主流LTCF中CALD老年人的研究的综合证据,达成当代的理解。确定了两个主要类别——对LTCF的看法,其中包括两个子类别:(a)最后一站且别无选择,以及(b)入院或转院原因;以及在LTCF中的生活经历,这也包括两个子类别:(a)希望保持与个人日常习惯的联系,以及(b)通过母语保持身份认同。CALD老年人对LTCF有不同的看法,这受到他们的文化背景和价值观的影响。未来的研究应该评估特定族裔的LTCF的有效性。在LTCF中,尤其是在主流机构中,为CALD老年人建立适合文化背景的服务,应该强调居民、医疗保健提供者和工作人员之间的文化包容。[《老年护理杂志》。2018年;11(5):265 - 276。]

相似文献

1
Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Older Adults and Mainstream Long-Term Care Facilities: Integrative Review of Views and Experiences.文化和语言背景各异的老年人与主流长期护理机构:观点与经历的综合综述
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018 Sep 1;11(5):265-276. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20180629-02. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
2
The effectiveness of culturally appropriate interventions to manage or prevent chronic disease in culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a systematic literature review.具有文化适应性的干预措施在文化和语言多样化社区中管理或预防慢性病的效果:系统文献回顾。
Health Soc Care Community. 2011 May;19(3):225-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00972.x. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
3
Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations in Medical Research: Perceptions and Experiences of Older Italians, Their Families, Ethics Administrators and Researchers.医学研究中的文化和语言多样化人群:老年意大利人及其家庭、伦理管理人员和研究人员的认知与经历
J Public Health Res. 2016 Apr 26;5(1):667. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2016.667.
4
What makes community-based physical activity programs for culturally and linguistically diverse older adults effective? A systematic review.是什么让针对文化和语言多样化的老年人群体的社区体育活动项目有效?一项系统综述。
Australas J Ageing. 2020 Dec;39(4):331-340. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12815. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Taiwanese long-term care facility residents' experiences of caring: a qualitative study.台湾长期护理机构居民的照护体验:一项质性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Sep;27(3):695-703. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01082.x. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
6
Choosing to live in a nursing home: a culturally and linguistically diverse perspective.选择入住养老院:多元文化和语言背景下的视角
Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(2):239-44. doi: 10.1071/PY13164.
7
Culturally and linguistically diverse students in speech-language pathology courses: A platform for culturally responsive services.言语病理学课程中具有文化和语言多样性的学生:一个提供具有文化响应性服务的平台。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Jun;19(3):309-321. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1292548. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
Two sides of the coin: patient and provider perceptions of health care delivery to patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.硬币的两面:来自文化和语言背景多样的患者和提供者对向患者提供医疗服务的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 18;12:322. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-322.
9
Mainstream versus ethno-specific community aged care services: it's not an 'either or'.主流老年护理服务与特定族裔社区老年护理服务:并非“非此即彼”。
Australas J Ageing. 2009 Jun;28(2):58-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00342.x.
10
Explaining culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) parents' access of healthcare services for developmental surveillance and anticipatory guidance: qualitative findings from the 'Watch Me Grow' study.解释文化和语言背景各异(CALD)的父母获取发育监测和预期指导医疗服务的情况:“看着我成长”研究的定性研究结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 22;17(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2143-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review protocol: what is the state of evidence for the use of communication apps with immigrant seniors in long-term care and community settings?范围综述方案:在长期护理和社区环境中,使用通讯应用程序与移民老年人沟通的证据状况如何?
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 21;14(8):e089939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089939.
2
Access to health services among culturally and linguistically diverse populations in the Australian universal health care system: issues and challenges.澳大利亚全民医疗保健体系中文化和语言多样化人群获得医疗服务的机会:问题与挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 3;22(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13256-z.
3
Barriers and facilitators of health among older adult immigrants in the United States: an integrative review of 20 years of literature.
美国老年移民健康的障碍和促进因素:对 20 年文献的综合回顾。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;22(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13042-x.
4
The experiences of the process of planning, starting and organizing a culturally specific nursing home for Finnish-speaking older persons: a qualitative study.为讲芬兰语的老年人规划、开办和组织一家具有特定文化特色的养老院的经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 19;20(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05644-1.