Huang Xuecheng, Ye Linqiang, Wu Zixian, Liang Lichang, Wang Qianli, Yu Weibo, Liang De, Jiang Xiaobing
First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Department of Spinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Jun 11;2018:2798396. doi: 10.1155/2018/2798396. eCollection 2018.
Most studies report that the common position of cervical spinal manipulation (CSM) for treating symptomatic cervical disc herniation (CDH) is lateral bending to the herniated side. However, the rationality of lateral bending position on performing CSM for CDH is still unclear.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical effects of lateral bending position on performing CSM for CDH.
A finite element (FE) model of CDH (herniated on the left side) was generated in C5-6 segment based on the normal FE model. The FE model performed CSM in left lateral bending position, neutral position, and right lateral bending position, respectively. Cervical disc displacement, annulus fiber stress, and facet joint stress were observed during the simulation of CSM.
The cervical disc displacement on herniated side moved forward during CSM, and the maximum forward displacements were 0.23, 0.36, and 0.45 mm in left lateral bending position, neutral position, and right lateral bending position, respectively. As the same trend of cervical disc displacement, the annulus fiber stresses on herniated side from small to large were 7.40, 16.39, and 22.75 MPa in left lateral bending position, neutral position, and right lateral bending position, respectively. However, the maximum facet stresses at left superior cartilage of C6 in left lateral bending position, neutral position, and right lateral bending position were 6.88, 3.60, and 0.12 MPa, respectively.
Compared with neutral position and right lateral bending position, though the forward displacement of cervical disc on herniated side was smaller in left lateral bending position, the annulus fiber stress on herniated side was declined by sharing load on the left facet joint. The results suggested that lateral bending to the herniated side on performing CSM tends to protect the cervical disc on herniated side. Future clinical studies are needed to verify that.
大多数研究报告称,治疗有症状的颈椎间盘突出症(CDH)时颈椎手法整复(CSM)的常见体位是向突出侧侧屈。然而,对于CDH进行CSM时侧屈体位的合理性仍不清楚。
本研究旨在探讨侧屈体位对CDH进行CSM的生物力学影响。
基于正常有限元模型,在C5-6节段生成左侧突出的CDH有限元(FE)模型。该FE模型分别在左侧屈位、中立位和右侧屈位进行CSM。在CSM模拟过程中观察颈椎间盘位移、纤维环应力和小关节应力。
CSM过程中,突出侧颈椎间盘位移向前移动,左侧屈位、中立位和右侧屈位的最大向前位移分别为0.23、0.36和0.45mm。随着颈椎间盘位移呈现相同趋势,左侧屈位、中立位和右侧屈位突出侧纤维环应力从小到大分别为7.40、16.39和22.75MPa。然而,左侧屈位、中立位和右侧屈位C6左侧上软骨处的最大小关节应力分别为6.88、3.60和0.12MPa。
与中立位和右侧屈位相比,虽然左侧屈位时突出侧颈椎间盘的向前位移较小,但通过分担左侧小关节的负荷,突出侧纤维环应力降低。结果表明,对CDH进行CSM时向突出侧侧屈倾向于保护突出侧的颈椎间盘。未来需要临床研究来验证这一点。