Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, UMR 6552 CNRS Ethologie Animale et Humaine, Université de Caen-Normandie, Station Biologique de Paimpont, Paimpont, France.
CNRS, UMR 6552 Ethologie animale et humaine, Université de Rennes 1, Université de Caen-Normandie, Rennes, France.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0197898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197898. eCollection 2018.
Indicators of positive emotions are still scarce and many proposed behavioural markers have proven ambiguous. Studies established a link between acoustic signals and emitter's internal state, but few related to positive emotions and still fewer considered non-vocal sounds. One of them, the snort, is shared by several perrisodactyls and has been associated to positive contexts in these species. We hypothesized that this could be also the case in horses. In this species, there is a clear need for a thorough description of non-vocal acoustic signals (snorts, snores or blows are often used interchangeably) but overall this sound produced by nostrils during expiration has up to now been mostly considered as having a hygienic function. However, observations revealed that snorts were produced more in some individuals than in others, without relationship with air conditions. We observed 48 horses living in two "extreme" conditions: restricted conditions (single stall, low roughage diet) and naturalistic conditions (stable groups in pasture). The immediate place (e.g. stall/pasture) and the behavioural/postural (behaviour performed/ears positions) contexts of snort production were observed. We additionally performed an evaluation of the welfare state, using validated behavioural (e.g. stereotypies) and postural (e.g. overall ears positions) welfare indicators. The results show that 1) snort production was significantly associated with situations known to be positive for horses (e.g. feeding in pasture) and with a positive internal state (ears in forward or sidewards positions), 2) the riding school horses produced twice as many snorts when in pasture than in stall, 3) the naturalistic population emitted significantly more snorts than riding school ones in comparable contexts, 4) the frequency of snorts was negatively correlated with the composite total chronic stress score (TCSS, reflecting compromised welfare based on the horse's rank on the different indicators): the lower the TCSS, the higher the snort rate. Snorts therefore appear as reliable indicators of positive emotions.
积极情绪的指标仍然很少,许多提出的行为标记已被证明是模糊的。研究建立了声信号与发射器内部状态之间的联系,但与积极情绪相关的研究很少,考虑到非声音的声音就更少了。其中之一,喷鼻声,是几种已灭绝的有蹄类动物共有的,并且与这些物种的积极环境有关。我们假设这种情况也可能发生在马身上。在这种情况下,非常需要对非声音声信号(喷鼻声、呼噜声或吹气声经常互换使用)进行彻底描述,但总的来说,这种通过鼻孔在呼气时产生的声音迄今为止主要被认为具有卫生功能。然而,观察结果表明,有些个体比其他个体更频繁地发出喷鼻声,与空气条件无关。我们观察了 48 匹马,它们生活在两种“极端”条件下:限制条件(单个马厩,低粗饲料饮食)和自然条件(牧场中的稳定马群)。观察了喷鼻声产生的即时位置(例如马厩/牧场)和行为/姿势(例如执行的行为/耳朵位置)背景。我们还使用经过验证的行为(例如刻板行为)和姿势(例如耳朵整体位置)福利指标对福利状况进行了评估。结果表明:1)喷鼻声的产生与对马来说是积极的情况(例如在牧场上进食)以及积极的内部状态(耳朵向前或侧向位置)显著相关;2)骑术学校的马在牧场上的喷鼻次数是在马厩里的两倍;3)自然条件下的马群在可比的情况下比骑术学校的马群发出的喷鼻声明显更多;4)喷鼻声的频率与慢性总应激评分(TCSS)呈负相关,TCSS 反映了马匹在不同指标上的等级所反映的福利受损:TCSS 越低,喷鼻率越高。因此,喷鼻声似乎是积极情绪的可靠指标。