Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland.
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3331-3.
Research on team effectiveness in healthcare has focussed on whether effective teams yield positive outcomes for patients and on the effectiveness of team interventions to improve performance. Limited understanding exists of what works for whom within an effective team, or how and why the context in which the team operates enables team members both as individuals and as a collective to enact behaviours that promote positive outcomes.
This realist synthesis of the literature explores the relationship between team interventions, underlying teamwork mechanisms generated by those interventions, and the resultant impact on patient outcomes in an acute hospital context. A systematic search of five healthcare and healthcare management academic databases: PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, ABInform, Emerald Management and three grey literature databases: ERIC, OpenDOAR and Open Grey was undertaken. Five experts in the field were also contacted to source relevant literature. Using PRISMA guidelines, relevant studies published between January 2006 and January 2017 were systematically searched by a team of three people. Drawing on realist methodology, data were synthesised using context, mechanism and outcome configurations as the unit of analysis to identify enablers and barriers to effective team interventions.
Out of 3347 papers retrieved, 18 were included in the final synthesis. From these, five contextual enablers were identified: an inter-disciplinary focus and flattened hierarchy; effective communication; leadership support and alignment of team goals with organisational goals; credibility of intervention; and appropriate team composition with physician involvement. Ten recurring mechanisms were identified, the most frequently occurring of which was shared responsibility.
The advantage of using realist synthesis to extrapolate data from the literature is that it considers the context and mechanisms that will impact effectiveness of healthcare team interventions. This methodological approach provides a different perspective to other types of syntheses and offers insight as to why certain contextual elements may yield more success than others. Findings therefore tend to have more practical implications. Specificity of detail in terms of how external drivers impact on healthcare team interventions was limited in the articles extracted for analysis. This broader perspective is therefore an important consideration for future research.
医疗保健团队效能的研究重点是高效团队是否能为患者带来积极的结果,以及团队干预措施在提高绩效方面的有效性。对于团队中什么对什么有效,或者团队运作的环境如何以及为什么能够使团队成员作为个体和集体来实施促进积极结果的行为,人们的理解有限。
本文献的现实主义综合研究探讨了团队干预措施、这些干预措施产生的基本团队机制,以及在急性医院环境中对患者结果的影响之间的关系。对五个医疗保健和医疗保健管理学术数据库:PubMed、PsychINFO、CINAHL、ABInform、Emerald Management 以及三个灰色文献数据库:ERIC、OpenDOAR 和 Open Grey 进行了系统搜索。还联系了五位该领域的专家以获取相关文献。根据 PRISMA 指南,由三人组成的团队对 2006 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月期间发表的相关研究进行了系统搜索。利用现实主义方法,使用上下文、机制和结果配置作为分析单位来综合数据,以确定有效团队干预措施的促进因素和障碍。
在 3347 篇论文中,有 18 篇被纳入最终综合研究。从中确定了五个背景促进因素:跨学科重点和扁平化层级;有效的沟通;领导支持和团队目标与组织目标的一致性;干预措施的可信度;以及适当的团队组成和医生的参与。确定了十个经常出现的机制,其中最常见的是共同责任。
使用现实主义综合方法从文献中推断数据的优势在于,它考虑了影响医疗保健团队干预措施有效性的背景和机制。这种方法为其他类型的综合研究提供了不同的视角,并提供了关于为什么某些背景因素可能比其他因素更成功的见解。因此,研究结果往往具有更实际的意义。在分析中提取的文章中,关于外部驱动力如何影响医疗保健团队干预措施的细节的具体性有限。因此,这种更广泛的视角是未来研究的一个重要考虑因素。