Roche C, Vagne M, Scarpignato C, Mutt V
Regul Pept. 1985 Oct;12(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(85)90193-4.
The stimulatory effect of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and secretin has been compared on exocrine pancreatic secretion in anaesthetized cats. Both peptides were given by bolus intravenous injection and continuous intravenous infusion. After bolus injection, VIP stimulated pancreatic secretion only weakly. On the contrary, during intravenous infusion, the maximal effect of VIP did not differ significantly from that of secretin. Therefore, while the potency of VIP is always lower than that of secretin, its efficacy appears to be strictly dependent on the mode of administration.
已比较了血管活性肠肽(VIP)和促胰液素对麻醉猫胰腺外分泌的刺激作用。两种肽均通过静脉推注和持续静脉输注给药。静脉推注后,VIP对胰腺分泌的刺激作用较弱。相反,在静脉输注期间,VIP的最大作用与促胰液素的最大作用无显著差异。因此,虽然VIP的效力总是低于促胰液素,但其功效似乎严格取决于给药方式。