• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低负荷血流限制下的肘关节屈伸运动所致肌肉疲劳:是否存在性别差异?

Muscle fatigue in response to low-load blood flow-restricted elbow-flexion exercise: are there any sex differences?

机构信息

Neuromuscular Research Lab, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz Quebrada Dafundo, 1499-002, Lisbon, Portugal.

CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Cruz Quebrada Dafundo, 1499-002, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Oct;118(10):2089-2096. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3940-x. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00421-018-3940-x
PMID:30006670
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether men and women display a different magnitude of muscle fatigue in response to high-load (HL) and low-load blood flow-restricted (LLBFR) elbow-flexion exercise. We also explored to which extent both exercise protocols induce similar levels of muscle fatigue (i.e., torque decrement).

METHODS

Sixty-two young participants (31 men and 31 women) performed dynamic elbow flexions at 20 and 75% of one-repetition maximum for LLBFR and HL exercise, respectively. Maximum voluntary isometric contractions were performed before and after exercise to quantify muscle fatigue.

RESULTS

Men and women exhibited similar magnitude of relative torque decrement after both exercise protocols (p > 0.05). HL was more fatiguing (∆ torque output: 11.9 and 23 N.m in women and men, respectively) than LLBFR resistance exercise (∆ torque output: 8.3 and 15.4 N.m in women and men, respectively) in both sexes, but this was largely attenuated after controlling for the differences in volume load between protocols (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that torque decrement in response to LLBFR and HL dynamic elbow-flexion exercise does not follow a sexually dimorphic pattern. Our data also indicate that, if performed in a multiple-set fashion and prescribed for a given volume load, elbow-flexion LLBFR exercise induces similar levels of fatigue as HL acute training. Importantly, this occurs similarly in both sexes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定男性和女性在高负荷(HL)和低负荷血流限制(LLBFR)肘部屈伸运动中对肌肉疲劳的反应是否存在不同程度。我们还探讨了这两种运动方案在多大程度上引起相似程度的肌肉疲劳(即扭矩下降)。

方法

62 名年轻参与者(31 名男性和 31 名女性)分别以 20%和 75%的 1 次重复最大量进行 LLBFR 和 HL 运动的动态肘部屈伸运动。在运动前后进行最大自主等长收缩,以量化肌肉疲劳。

结果

男性和女性在两种运动方案后表现出相似程度的相对扭矩下降(p > 0.05)。HL 比 LLBFR 阻力运动更疲劳(女性和男性的∆扭矩输出分别为 11.9 和 23 N.m),但在控制方案之间的体积负荷差异后,这种差异在很大程度上减弱(p > 0.05)。

结论

这些数据表明,LLBFR 和 HL 动态肘部屈伸运动引起的扭矩下降并不遵循性别二态模式。我们的数据还表明,如果以多组方式进行并按给定的体积负荷规定,肘部屈伸 LLBFR 运动引起的疲劳程度与 HL 急性训练相似。重要的是,这在两性中都是相似的。

相似文献

1
Muscle fatigue in response to low-load blood flow-restricted elbow-flexion exercise: are there any sex differences?低负荷血流限制下的肘关节屈伸运动所致肌肉疲劳:是否存在性别差异?
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Oct;118(10):2089-2096. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3940-x. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Supraspinal fatigue does not explain the sex difference in muscle fatigue of maximal contractions.脊髓上疲劳并不能解释最大收缩时肌肉疲劳的性别差异。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Oct;101(4):1036-44. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00103.2006. Epub 2006 May 25.
3
Greater neuromuscular fatigue following low-load blood flow restriction than non-blood flow restriction resistance exercise among recreationally active men.在业余活跃男性中,低负荷血流限制比非血流限制抗阻运动后神经肌肉疲劳更大。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;128(1):73-85. doi: 10.1152/jn.00028.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
4
The effect of blood flow occlusion during acute low-intensity isometric elbow flexion exercise.急性低强度等长肘屈伸运动中血流阻断的效果。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Mar;119(3):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04088-8. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
Mechanisms of fatigue differ after low- and high-force fatiguing contractions in men and women.男性和女性在低强度和高强度疲劳性收缩后的疲劳机制有所不同。
Muscle Nerve. 2007 Oct;36(4):515-24. doi: 10.1002/mus.20844.
6
Neuromuscular function after a bout of low-load blood flow-restricted exercise.低负荷血流限制运动后神经肌肉功能。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jan;45(1):67-74. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31826c6fa8.
7
Sex differences in fatigue resistance are muscle group dependent.抗疲劳能力的性别差异取决于肌肉群。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Oct;42(10):1943-50. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d8f8fa.
8
Effects of repeated long-duration water immersions on skeletal muscle performance in well-trained male divers.反复长时间浸水对训练有素的男性潜水员骨骼肌性能的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Oct;118(10):2065-2076. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3928-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
9
Acute effects of exercise under different levels of blood-flow restriction on muscle activation and fatigue.不同程度血流限制下运动对肌肉激活和疲劳的急性影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):985-95. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3359-1. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
10
Increases in M-wave latency of biceps brachii after elbow flexor eccentric contractions in women.女性肱二头肌在进行屈肘肌离心收缩后M波潜伏期增加。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):939-46. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3358-2. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The immediate effects of blood flow restriction training on upper limb muscle strength and fatigue level: a meta-analysis.血流限制训练对上肢肌肉力量和疲劳水平的即时影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Physiol. 2025 Jul 1;16:1521145. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1521145. eCollection 2025.
2
The Discrepancy Between External and Internal Load/Intensity during Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Understanding Blood Flow Restriction Pressure as Modulating Factor.血流限制训练中外部与内部负荷/强度之间的差异:将血流限制压力理解为调节因素
Sports Med Open. 2024 Sep 4;10(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00759-9.
3
The effects of blood flow restriction training on post activation potentiation and upper limb muscle activation: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute Neuromuscular Adaptations in Response to Low-Intensity Blood-Flow Restricted Exercise and High-Intensity Resistance Exercise: Are There Any Differences?低强度血流限制运动和高强度抗阻运动对急性神经肌肉适应的影响:有何不同?
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):902-910. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002022.
2
Impact of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise on Muscle Fatigue Development and Recovery.血流限制训练对肌肉疲劳发展和恢复的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Mar;50(3):436-446. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001475.
3
Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?
血流限制训练对激活后增强及上肢肌肉激活的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 11;15:1395283. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1395283. eCollection 2024.
4
Sex differences in muscle fatigue following isokinetic muscle contractions.等速肌肉收缩后肌肉疲劳的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 14;11(1):8141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87443-0.
在抗阻运动过程中产生的代谢物会增强肌肉肥大吗?
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Nov;117(11):2125-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3690-1. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
Low-load resistance training with low relative pressure produces muscular changes similar to high-load resistance training.低相对压力下的低负荷阻力训练产生的肌肉变化与高负荷阻力训练相似。
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Dec;56(6):E126-E133. doi: 10.1002/mus.25626. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
5
Let's talk about sex: where are the young females in blood flow restriction research?我们来谈谈性别:血流限制研究中的年轻女性在哪里?
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-3. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12394. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
Training to Fatigue: The Answer for Standardization When Assessing Muscle Hypertrophy?训练至疲劳:评估肌肉肥大时标准化的答案?
Sports Med. 2017 Jun;47(6):1021-1027. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0633-7.
7
Sex differences in fatigability of dynamic contractions.动态收缩疲劳性中的性别差异。
Exp Physiol. 2016 Feb;101(2):250-5. doi: 10.1113/EP085370. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Sex differences with aging in the fatigability of dynamic contractions.动态收缩疲劳性随衰老的性别差异。
Exp Gerontol. 2015 Oct;70:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
9
Blood flow occlusion pressure at rest and immediately after a bout of low load exercise.静息状态下以及一轮低负荷运动后即刻的血流阻断压力。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016 Nov;36(6):436-440. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12246. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Exercise with blood flow restriction: an updated evidence-based approach for enhanced muscular development.血流限制训练:一种基于最新证据的增强肌肉发育的方法。
Sports Med. 2015 Mar;45(3):313-25. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0288-1.