William Paterson University, 300 Pompton Road, Wayne, NJ, 07470, USA.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2019 Jun;21(3):586-595. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0787-5.
The cultural and ethnic landscape of North America is becoming increasingly diverse, with many refugees fleeing torture and persecution and seeking safety in the United States and Canada. In working with this population, clinicians must implement culturally appropriate methods of assessing and treating individuals from diverse backgrounds. Culture can exert a powerful and often misunderstood influence on psychological assessment, and the critical challenge is to account for both subjective experience of the client and the objective symptoms or behaviors present. The present review explores the literature on cross-cultural issues in the assessment of survivors of torture. I summarize best practices and review the theoretical and statistical bases for establishing the equivalence of constructs across cultures. Discussion centers around the utility of a cross-culturally valid measure of distress, and it is hoped that this review will encourage collaboration between clinicians and psychometricians to develop assessments for use with this vulnerable population.
北美的文化和民族格局正变得日益多样化,许多难民为逃避酷刑和迫害而逃到美国和加拿大寻求安全。在为这部分人群服务时,临床医生必须采用文化上适宜的方法来评估和治疗来自不同背景的个体。文化对心理评估会产生强大的、常常被误解的影响,关键的挑战是既要考虑到客户的主观体验,又要考虑到存在的客观症状或行为。本综述探讨了有关酷刑幸存者评估中的跨文化问题的文献。我总结了最佳实践,并回顾了在跨文化背景下建立结构等效性的理论和统计基础。讨论集中在一种具有跨文化效度的痛苦衡量标准的效用上,希望本综述将鼓励临床医生和心理计量学家之间的合作,以开发出针对这一弱势群体的评估工具。